On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:56:33PM +, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: cherry
Date: Sun Jun 26 12:56:33 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/xen/include [cherry-xenmp]: intr.h
src/sys/arch/xen/xen [cherry-xenmp]: hypervisor.c
Log Message:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 04:00:47PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:56:33PM +, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: cherry
Date: Sun Jun 26 12:56:33 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/xen/include
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 05:57:37PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Also, you seem to assume that all x86 CPUs on today's market are muticore;
this is not true.
No, I don't assume that. My reasoning is more like: this is one of
On 6/26/2011 3:00 PM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:56:33PM +, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: cherry
Date: Sun Jun 26 12:56:33 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/xen/include [cherry-xenmp]: intr.h
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 06:16:47PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sun Jun 26 22:16:46 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/db/recno: rec_open.c
Log Message:
use O_CLOEXEC
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:55:33AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Don't give out information about processes we can't control.
Thanks to Aleksey and you for fixing the procfs leak.
I wonder whether pmap's code is the right place to check for
information access control. It's
