On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:18:54AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
On 18.07.2011 02:00, David Young wrote:
Can we please use ansi function definitions in newly committed code?
This was tedious enough without converting to ANSI function definitions.
A good job for Coccinelle (spatch)?
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:26:59AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
making port-alpha build by simply removing what isn't building is the
wrong answer, unless you're positive that is the right thing to do.
This was rather poor phrasing, wasn't it?
hope you understand this then: please revert
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:41:30 +0100, David Laight wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:18:54AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
On 18.07.2011 02:00, David Young wrote:
Can we please use ansi function definitions in newly committed
code?
This was tedious enough without converting to ANSI function
Matthias Scheler t...@netbsd.org writes:
Log Message:
Don't use roundup2(9) (which should have been howmany(9) anyway) to
fix builds on platforms other than NetBSD.
Since usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660.[ch] already uses howmany(), we can use it
here too, can't we?
enami.
From: Matthias Scheler t...@netbsd.org
Subject: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/makefs
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:52:37 +
Module Name: src
Committed By: tron
Date: Mon Jul 18 22:52:37 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/usr.sbin/makefs: Makefile makefs.c makefs.h
Log Message:
