On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:01:05 -0400
Christos Zoulas chris...@netbsd.org wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sat Jul 30 17:01:05 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/conf: files
src/sys/kern: init_main.c kern_lwp.c kern_synch.c
Added Files:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:16:30PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:04:24PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
...
Note that for a uncontested resource, the overhead of a mutex for a
single operation tends to be comparable, if store fences have a similar
price than bus
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Jean-Yves Migeon
jeanyves.mig...@free.fr wrote:
On 30.07.2011 19:01, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sat Jul 30 17:01:05 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/conf: files
src/sys/kern: init_main.c
On Jul 31, 10:07am, adam.h...@gmail.com (Adam Hoka) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys
| On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:01:05 -0400
| Christos Zoulas chris...@netbsd.org wrote:
|
| Module Name:src
| Committed By: christos
| Date: Sat Jul 30 17:01:05 UTC 2011
|
|
Can we please stop abusing the notation of GCC is available to mean
GCC is used? If you want a GCC-specific warning flag, at least put it
into CWARNFLAGS.gcc. I'm actually in favour of dropping this
unconditionally -- GCC 4.1 is just behaving way too lax for this option
to make sense.
Joerg
On
