On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:10:13AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
Log Message:
Fail namei immediately if searchdir is unlinked / has been rmdir'd.
Do this by checking if v_size == 0. Should fix PR 44658 (and PR 32661).
why is this necessary? can't we just let VOP_LOOKUP fail?
hi,
Module Name: src
Committed By: manu
Date: Wed Aug 3 04:11:17 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/bin/cp: cp.c utils.c
src/bin/mv: mv.c
src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: mi
src/lib/libc/gen: Makefile.inc extattr.3 extattr.c
src/lib/libc/sys:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:59:48AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
is extattr_namespace_access really necessary?
uid-based priviledge check in userland is often a mistake.
For now it duplicates the same simple access check as in kernel:
system attributes are restricted to root. This is just a
On 10 August 2011 13:39, Cherry G. Mathew che...@netbsd.org wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: cherry
Date: Wed Aug 10 11:39:46 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64: fpu.c machdep.c
src/sys/arch/i386/isa: npx.c
src/sys/arch/x86/x86:
hi,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:59:48AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
is extattr_namespace_access really necessary?
uid-based priviledge check in userland is often a mistake.
For now it duplicates the same simple access check as in kernel:
system attributes are restricted to root. This is
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 07:22:06AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
why is this necessary? can't we just let VOP_LOOKUP fail?
Not to fix PR 44658.
it's better to fix the vn_isunder check instead of avoiding running it.
IMO vn_isunder should return acutal error code (eg. ENOENT)
[ moving to tech-kern ]
hi,
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
Here is the updated patch after your changes:
http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/uvm_anon_freelst2.diff
As you noted, uvm_anfree() can temporarily release the amap lock - that
can happen in amap_copy().
