On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:26:24AM +, David Holland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:13:29AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:37:08PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:31:31AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
In article 20110822104822.gb15...@britannica.bec.de,
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:26:24AM +, David Holland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:13:29AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:37:08PM +, David Holland
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:48:02PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
It doesn't. The prototypes in strings.h already ensure that
uint32_t/uint64_t are present and that's the only thing it could ever
need from stdint.h.
Yes it does. strings.h is included by string.h and is
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:47:40 +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
This is slightly more complicated than it appears. Some of the ops
in
a per-cpu queue may have ordering dependencies with other cpu
queues,
and I think this would be hard to express trivially. (an example
would
be a pte update on one
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 16:48:02 +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:48:22 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
[...]
You are skinning the wrong cat. string.h shouldn't include strings.h in
first place.
#if defined(_NETBSD_SOURCE)
#include strings.h /* for
Module Name:src
Committed By: mrg
Date: Mon Aug 22 09:43:08 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/i386/stand/boot: Makefile.boot
Log Message:
disable mmx/sse here too. hopefully fixes amd64 /boot issues.
certainly changes the output in ways that gcc 4.1 doesn't.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:48:22PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Requires stdint.h.
No?
uh what?
It doesn't. The prototypes in strings.h already ensure that
uint32_t/uint64_t are present and that's the only thing it could ever
need from
Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org writes:
I guess something like following change is necessary so that when both
tv_nsec is set to UTIME_NOW,
1) to perform same permission check as when NULL is passed to 2nd
arg.
2) to set same value for both atime and mtime.
I think you
NAKAJIMA Yoshihiro nakay...@leto.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
Um, what should be done in distribs/sets/lists?
Would s/libc.so.12.178/libc.so.12.179/ eveywhere be enough?
I think so.
One last concern: extended API set 2 support is not yet complete.
Shouldn't we bump for once when it is done, instead
NAKAJIMA Yoshihiro nakay...@leto.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
Um, what should be done in distribs/sets/lists?
Would s/libc.so.12.178/libc.so.12.179/ eveywhere be enough?
I think so.
One last concern: extended API set 2 support is not yet complete.
Shouldn't we bump for once when it is done,
matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
ps. don't forgot to look at the sparc64/amd64/mips64 compat libs
when bumping shlib versions.
You mean in src/distrib/sets?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
