On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:04:39AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Tue Aug 23 10:04:39 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/bin/sh: expand.c
>
> Log Message:
> PR/45269: Andreas Gustafsson: Instead of falling off the edge when eating
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:04:39AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Tue Aug 23 10:04:39 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/bin/sh: expand.c
>
> Log Message:
> PR/45269: Andreas Gustafsson: Instead of falling off the edge when eating
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:29:36AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:25:08PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> > > > the minor number should be bumped any time a symbol is added to a
> > > > library.
> > > >
> > > > the major number should be bumped any time a symbols is rem
David Laight wrote:
> I'd have thought that these functions could be added 'hidded' to allow
> other developers (etc) to do further testing, then the version
> bumped when they are made visible by default.
This is how I was planning to do it initially: bump once the extended
API set 2 is complet
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:31:37AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> >
> > One last concern: extended API set 2 support is not yet complete.
> > Shouldn't we bump for once when it is done, instead of bumping for each
> > system call added?
>
> the minor number should be bumped any time a symbol is ad
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:25:08PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> > > the minor number should be bumped any time a symbol is added to a
> > > library.
> > >
> > > the major number should be bumped any time a symbols is removed
> > > from or an ABI changed in a library.
> > >
> > >
> > > t
> > the minor number should be bumped any time a symbol is added to a
> > library.
> >
> > the major number should be bumped any time a symbols is removed
> > from or an ABI changed in a library.
> >
> >
> > this is pretty much all there is to the rules, and they're not
> > limited by other imp
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:20:34AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> In another change set, I am about moving extended attribute functions
> from libc to libutil. Should libc major be bumped?
Uh. Bumping libc's major version is a Very Big Deal. So, no. Please
bring this up on tech-userlevel to ma
