Am 18.10.11 06:27, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:07:45AM +, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:jmcneill
Date:Tue Oct 18 00:07:45 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/x86/x86: vmt.c
Log Message:
don't allow module
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 18.10.11 06:27, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:07:45AM +, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jmcneill
Date: Tue Oct 18 00:07:45 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
On 18 October 2011 10:07, Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 18.10.11 06:27, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:07:45AM +, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jmcneill
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: wiz
Date: Tue Oct 18 09:50:25 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/man: mi
src/share/man/man4: Makefile
Added Files:
src/share/man/man4: vmt.4
Log
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:15:08PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: wiz
Date: Tue Oct 18 09:50:25 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/man: mi
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded.
What do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded and only
autounloading the autoloaded ones?
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 18.10.11
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:39:49AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded.
What do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded and only
autounloading the autoloaded ones?
That sounds right to me.
As noted, generally I am not
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:39:49AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded.
What do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded and only
autounloading the autoloaded ones?
That
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:44:52PM +0100, Iain Hibbert wrote:
The real benefit of the modular system is that you don't need to load
hundreds of modules on the off chance that they will be used. A cron entry
could be used to flush unused modules if the sysop cares about that, why
do we need a
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:39:49AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded.
What do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded and only
autounloading the autoloaded ones?
That sounds
Well I loaded vmt manually and it was auto unloaded on me a few minutes later,
that's why I made this change in the first place.
On 2011-10-18, at 7:57 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:39:49AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
I would
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:59:35AM -0400, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
Well I loaded vmt manually and it was auto unloaded on me a few minutes
later, that's why I made this change in the first place.
On 2011-10-18, at 7:57 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
No wonder, in the thread if uvmexp.free uvmexp.freemin it skips the
mod_autotime == 0 check.
On 2011-10-18, at 8:06 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:59:35AM -0400, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
Well I loaded vmt manually and it was auto unloaded on me a few minutes
later,
Fixed.
On 2011-10-18, at 8:06 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
True. But like Jared, I've also seen magic unloading of some of my driver
modules. I guess there is a bug somewhere.
- Jukka.
On Oct 18, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Jared McNeill wrote:
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded. What
do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded and only autounloading the
autoloaded ones?
If I manually load a dozen drivers at boot because I have a dozen
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 02:25:06PM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: wiz
Date: Tue Oct 18 14:25:06 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man4/man4.x86: vmt.4
Log Message:
Fix xref; comment out cpu(4) reference, does not exist.
We could write
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 03:39:10PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: manu
Date: Tue Oct 18 15:39:09 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/fs/puffs: puffs_msgif.c puffs_node.c puffs_vfsops.c
puffs_vnops.c
Log Message:
Make sure pagedaemon
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:49:39AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Jared McNeill wrote:
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded.
What do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
+#ifdef DIAGNOSTIC
+ KASSERT(curlwp != uvm.pagedaemon_lwp);
+#endif
Why pollute code with redundant #ifdefs?
Right, I missed the point that KASSERT contains #ifdef DIAGNOSTIC. I
will fix that tomorrow morning.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Am 18.10.11 12:39, schrieb Jared McNeill:
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded.
What do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded and only
autounloading the autoloaded ones?
I'd say that is a safe way. I am for it.
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jukka
Am 18.10.11 13:44, schrieb Iain Hibbert:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:39:49AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
I would argue that any manually loaded module shouldn't be autounloaded.
What do you think about flagging modules as autoloaded and only
21 matches
Mail list logo
