On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 05:49:41PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
For completeness, it should be:
.if ${HAVE_GCC:U} == 45 ${MACHINE_CPU} == arm
COPTS.getaddrinfo.c+= ${${ACTIVE_CC} == gcc :? -fno-tree-ter :}
COPTS.gethnameaddr.c+= ${${ACTIVE_CC} == gcc :? -fno-tree-ter :}
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:13:21AM +, Michael Lorenz wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: macallan
Date: Sat Dec 24 02:13:21 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/rasops: rasops32.c
Log Message:
rename alpha variable to avoid conflict with a platform macro on alpha
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 05:49:41PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
For completeness, it should be:
.if ${HAVE_GCC:U} == 45 ${MACHINE_CPU} == arm
COPTS.getaddrinfo.c+= ${${ACTIVE_CC} == gcc :? -fno-tree-ter :}
COPTS.gethnameaddr.c+=${${ACTIVE_CC} == gcc :? -fno-tree-ter :}
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:44:10PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
That adds a lot of restrictions on when UNSUPPORT_COMPILER.XXX can be
set. I don't think it's a good idea to do that.
i don't understand this. can you explain it further?
The suggested pattern allows the variable to be set
