In article 20120217021118.ca61c17...@cvs.netbsd.org,
Alistair G. Crooks source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
+{
+ if ((share-io.base = calloc(1, size)) == NULL) {
+ (void) fprintf(stderr, allocate: can't calloc %zu\n, size);
warn() + __func__ instead?
christos
Is there anybody who has old versions of /etc/pwd.db
and/etc/spwd.db (created under NetBSD-5 or earlier), on a system
running the netbsd-6 branch? Can you test whether postinstall
check pwd_mkdb and postinstall fix pwd_pkdb work with the
-current version of postinstall?
# verify that you
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:15:33PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
I'd rather re-organize the contents of the files so that sparc64 is not
different than everyone else.
I just needed a quick build fix - feel free to rename/move...
Martin
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:18:00PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article 20120217021118.ca61c17...@cvs.netbsd.org,
Alistair G. Crooks source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
+{
+if ((share-io.base = calloc(1, size)) == NULL) {
+(void) fprintf(stderr, allocate: can't calloc
/snapshot/20120217/root/i386/usr/include -D_LIBC
-DLIBC_SCCS -DSYSLIBC_SCCS -D_REENTRANT -DHESIOD -DINET6 -DNLS -DYP
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I/usr/src/lib/libc -I/usr/src/sys
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/compat/../locale -I/usr/src/lib/libc/compat/stdlib
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/compat/../stdlib
-I/usr/src
On 2/17/12 5:43 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jmmv
Date: Fri Feb 17 22:36:50 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/tests: module.mi
src/tests/modules: Makefile
Added Files:
On 2/17/12 5:45 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 5:43 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jmmv
Date: Fri Feb 17 22:36:50 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
On 2/17/12 5:58 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 5:45 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
So the modules are broken on purpose?
Yes.
Interesting. If that's the case, shouldn't we break PAGE_SIZE for
Module Name:src
Committed By: jmmv
Date: Fri Feb 17 22:36:50 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/lists/tests: module.mi
src/tests/modules: Makefile
Added Files:
src/tests/modules: t_abi_uvm.sh
src/tests/modules/k_uvm: Makefile
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 5:58 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 5:45 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
So the modules are broken on purpose?
Yes.
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 5:45 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 5:43 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jmmv
Date:
On 2/17/12 7:11 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 6:42 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
On 2/17/12 6:06 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
Aha, I see. Does it make sense to keep the test after renaming
PAGE_SIZE
As discussed somewhere some time ago, I think PAGE_SIZE and other
constants should be provided via sysconf(9).
If you don't like indirection, you'd use pre-link binaries (== static kernel).
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Julio Merino j...@julipedia.org wrote:
On 2/17/12 7:11 PM, Julio Merino
13 matches
Mail list logo
