David A. Holland writes:
Module Name: src
Committed By: dholland
Date: Thu Oct 30 06:13:50 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/usr.bin/rsh: rsh.c
Log Message:
Drop setuid before execing rlogin. Failure to do so should be
harmless, but is sloppy.
as jnemeth reminded me, this
On Oct 30, 6:13am, David A. Holland wrote:
}
} Module Name: src
} Committed By: dholland
} Date: Thu Oct 30 06:13:50 UTC 2014
}
} Modified Files:
} src/usr.bin/rsh: rsh.c
}
} Log Message:
} Drop setuid before execing rlogin. Failure to do so should be
} harmless, but is sloppy.
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
What do you expect by doing:
options FOO
no options FOO
options FOO
I expect it to be equivalent to just one options FOO.
The no options FOO in line 2 should cancel the options FOO in
line 1, and then the options FOO in line 3 should put it
On 10/30/14 10:36, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Thu Oct 30 01:36:13 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/usr.bin/config: mkheaders.c
Log Message:
print more info about the overflow
It panics on amd64 when negative value is specified like
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Alan Barrett a...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
What do you expect by doing:
options FOO
no options FOO
options FOO
I expect it to be equivalent to just one options FOO.
The no options FOO in line 2 should cancel the
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:27:06PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Alan Barrett a...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
What do you expect by doing:
options FOO
no options FOO
options FOO
I expect it to be equivalent
In article 54522b88.7060...@gmail.com,
Takahiro HAYASHI t.hash...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/30/14 10:36, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:christos
Date:Thu Oct 30 01:36:13 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/usr.bin/config: mkheaders.c
Log Message:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:14:50AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Christos Zoulas chris...@astron.com wrote:
In article 20141030012621.0982...@cvs.netbsd.org,
Masao Uebayashi source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
Re: constructors/destructors:
Using them
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:54:41PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
On Oct 30, 6:13am, David A. Holland wrote:
}
} Module Name: src
} Committed By: dholland
} Date: Thu Oct 30 06:13:50 UTC 2014
}
} Modified Files:
}src/usr.bin/rsh: rsh.c
}
} Log
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:40:57PM +, David Holland wrote:
}
} Module Name:src
} Committed By: dholland
} Date: Thu Oct 30 06:13:50 UTC 2014
}
} Modified Files:
} src/usr.bin/rsh: rsh.c
}
} Log Message:
} Drop setuid before
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:27:06PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
So, while you expect that options works before it's defined, you
also expect the order is honored for no use. I'm not sure how it
can work internally.
At this moment, no are evaluated when it's parsed. Those no agp*
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Quentin Garnier c...@cubidou.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:27:06PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Alan Barrett a...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
What do you expect by doing:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Antti Kantee
po...@homeworld.netbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:14:50AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Christos Zoulas chris...@astron.com
wrote:
In article 20141030012621.0982...@cvs.netbsd.org,
Masao Uebayashi
On 30/10/14 17:28, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
Is there a problem rototilling config is going to solve over what
is possible with the existing mechanism (*)?
You're welcomed to fix any problems without rotorill and/or breakage.
You're not answering the question.
*) you probably also heard that
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Antti Kantee
po...@homeworld.netbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:14:50AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Christos Zoulas chris...@astron.com
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Antti Kantee po...@netbsd.org wrote:
On 30/10/14 17:28, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
Is there a problem rototilling config is going to solve over what
is possible with the existing mechanism (*)?
You're welcomed to fix any problems without rotorill and/or
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:49 AM, David Holland
dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:27:06PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
So, while you expect that options works before it's defined, you
also expect the order is honored for no use. I'm not sure how it
can
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 03:36:45 +0900
From: Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:49 AM, David Holland
dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:27:06PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
At this moment, no are evaluated when it's
On Oct 30, 6:58pm, Martin Husemann wrote:
}
} Module Name: src
} Committed By: martin
} Date: Thu Oct 30 18:58:45 UTC 2014
}
} Modified Files:
} src/sys/arch/x86/x86 [netbsd-7]: identcpu.c
}
} Log Message:
} Pull up following revision(s) (requested by riz in ticket #171):
}
19 matches
Mail list logo
