Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2016-11-25 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Maxime Villard writes: > AFAICT, emacs is known to be buggy on netbsd. That's strange, seeing as I've been using it daily since NetBSD 0.0, with no problems. That's on i386, vax, mips, sparc, and amd64 platforms. (It's been a while since I had a vax, mips, or sparc system

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2016-11-25 Thread David Holland
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:04:20PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote: > ? It probably means there is some kind of stupid assumption or hack in > emacs. If you could send me the core, the binary and tell me which arch it > is, that would be nice. No, if there is a problem it is somewhere in

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2016-11-25 Thread David Holland
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:28:56PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: > > Put a one-page redzone between userland and the PTE space on amd64 and > > i386. > > > > The PTE space is a critical region that maps the page tree, and bugs have > > been found in both amd64 and i386 where the kernel would

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

2016-11-25 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Nov 26, 3:24am, n...@gmx.com (Kamil Rytarowski) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel | PT_READ_D and PT_READ_I read single int according to documentation. | | In tests io_read_d* io_read_i* data blocks are printed with appropriate | PRIxN. | | I cannot spot a mistake in the

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

2016-11-25 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
On 25.11.2016 23:41, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article , > Christos Zoulas wrote: >> In article <20161125200105.5dbb4f...@cvs.netbsd.org>, >> Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>> -=-=-=-=-=- >>> >>> Module Name:

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

2016-11-25 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20161125200105.5dbb4f...@cvs.netbsd.org>, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Module Name: src >Committed By: kamil >Date: Fri Nov 25 20:01:05 UTC 2016 > >Modified Files: > src/tests/kernel: t_ptrace_wait.c > >Log Message: >Fix

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2016-11-25 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:04:20PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote: > AFAICT, emacs is known to be buggy on netbsd. Works well enough for my daily use on 7.0.2/amd64 and 7.99.42/amd64 (from about two weeks ago) and most releases in-between that I tried. So I don't think this can be said in general.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2016-11-25 Thread Anders Magnusson
Den 2016-11-25 kl. 13:04, skrev Maxime Villard: Le 24/11/2016 à 14:28, Masanobu SAITOH a écrit : Hi! On 2016/11/19 18:22, Maxime Villard wrote: Module Name:src Committed By:maxv Date:Sat Nov 19 09:22:04 UTC 2016 Modified Files: src/sys/arch/amd64/include: vmparam.h

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2016-11-25 Thread Maxime Villard
Le 24/11/2016 à 14:28, Masanobu SAITOH a écrit : Hi! On 2016/11/19 18:22, Maxime Villard wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: maxv Date: Sat Nov 19 09:22:04 UTC 2016 Modified Files: src/sys/arch/amd64/include: vmparam.h src/sys/arch/i386/include: vmparam.h Log