re: CVS commit: src/sys/uvm

2017-03-20 Thread matthew green
> Log Message: > Ugh. This stuff is disgusting. We really need an arch dependent > PRIxOFF (and PRIdOFF) to print off_t's in a way that matches the > arch's definition of off_t. off_t is supposed to be more-MI. it comes down to: sys/types.h:177:typedef __off_t off_t; /*

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/uvm

2017-03-20 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:03:31 +0100 From:Joerg Sonnenberger Message-ID: <20170320120331.ga19...@britannica.bec.de> | On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:44:24AM +, Robert Elz wrote: | > Why is there no PRI[xd]OFF ? How are off_t's intended to be

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/uvm

2017-03-20 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:44:24AM +, Robert Elz wrote: > Why is there no PRI[xd]OFF ? How are off_t's intended to be printed? %jd + cast to intmax_t. Joerg