> what sort of testing did you do with this change? simply removing
> it breaks the build. and trying to fix it otherwise is hard. see
> only a month ago:
huh.
my build *did* complete. so something else has changed in the
last month or so to fix this...
sorry for the noise.
.mrg.
"Maya Rashish" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: maya
> Date: Sat Feb 8 21:16:53 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/mk: sys.mk
>
> Log Message:
> Don't special case aarch64 and add -fomit-frame-pointer to builds.
>
> This behaviour is probably due to a past behavio
> On Feb 8, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Andrew Doran wrote:
>
> Bit concerning that we're growing a ton of kthreads in the network stack (my
> test system now has something like 700 kthreads total) but I'm less worried
> about that and moreso that a lot of these seem to be in the kernel RT range
> and
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:30:20PM +, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/net: if.c if.h
> src/sys/netinet: ip_carp.c
>
> Log Message:
> Perform link state change processing on a work queue, rather than in a
> softint.
Thinking out loud more than anything else:
Bit
