On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 19:54 +, nia wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:14:29PM -0400, David H. Gutteridge wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:04:28 +, nia wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:16:00PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> > > > this doesn't seem like the right design. we have
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:14:29PM -0400, David H. Gutteridge wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:04:28 +, nia wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:16:00PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> >> this doesn't seem like the right design. we have cpus
> >> already that have multiple frequency domains,
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 09:04:28 +, nia wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:16:00PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>> this doesn't seem like the right design. we have cpus
>> already that have multiple frequency domains, so this
>> doesn't work with that setup, so attempt to use it as a
>> general
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:16:00PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> this doesn't seem like the right design. we have cpus
> already that have multiple frequency domains, so this
> doesn't work with that setup, so attempt to use it as a
> general method for estd etc seems limited and thsu not
> the
