Module Name:src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Sun Nov 24 04:24:18 UTC 2024
Modified Files:
src/lib/libarch: Makefile
Added Files:
src/lib/libarch/alpha: alpha.expsym
src/lib/libarch/arm: arm.expsym
src/lib/libarch/i386: i386.expsym
src/lib/li
Module Name:src
Committed By: riastradh
Date: Sun Nov 24 04:24:18 UTC 2024
Modified Files:
src/lib/libarch: Makefile
Added Files:
src/lib/libarch/alpha: alpha.expsym
src/lib/libarch/arm: arm.expsym
src/lib/libarch/i386: i386.expsym
src/lib/li
Module Name:src
Committed By: uwe
Date: Mon Sep 11 12:00:45 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/lib/libarch/sparc/v8: sparc_v8.S
Log Message:
sparc_v8.S: fix v8 .mul/.umul versions to conform to psABI
Both .mul and .umul are defined to return the most significant 32 bits
of the
Module Name:src
Committed By: uwe
Date: Mon Sep 11 12:00:45 UTC 2023
Modified Files:
src/lib/libarch/sparc/v8: sparc_v8.S
Log Message:
sparc_v8.S: fix v8 .mul/.umul versions to conform to psABI
Both .mul and .umul are defined to return the most significant 32 bits
of the
Le 12/08/2017 à 23:07, matthew green a écrit :
"Maxime Villard" writes:
Module Name:src
Committed By: maxv
Date: Sat Aug 12 19:48:28 UTC 2017
Modified Files:
src/lib/libarch/i386: shlib_version
Log Message:
Bump - removal of i386_vm86 and i386_pmc.
i didn't check the
"Maxime Villard" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: maxv
> Date: Sat Aug 12 19:48:28 UTC 2017
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libarch/i386: shlib_version
>
> Log Message:
> Bump - removal of i386_vm86 and i386_pmc.
i didn't check the build, but this also needs set lists upda
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:35:48AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> When was the last time that NetBSD could be compiled with a K&R compiler?
> 1995?
Dunno, but we killed supported ports because we have no working C99 compiler
for them (playstation2).
Martin
On Mar 22, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
>> IMHO, as long as lint is capable of helping us spot actual
>> problems, adding a few of these sorts of constrcucts seems like a
>> small price to pay.
>
> It doesn't. From w
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> IMHO, as long as lint is capable of helping us spot actual
> problems, adding a few of these sorts of constrcucts seems like a
> small price to pay.
It doesn't. From what I see, the signal to noise ratio of lint is
completely inaccep
In article <20120322100642.ga1...@apb-laptoy.apb.alt.za>,
Alan Barrett wrote:
>I don't know what "balancing" means, but this seems bogus to
>me. The type of the right hand operand of the << operator is
>irrelevant; only its value is important. (See sectiopn 6.5.7 of
>the C99 standard.)
Bal
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:54:49AM +, Havard Eidnes wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:he
>> Date:Thu Mar 22 08:54:48 UTC 2012
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/lib/libarch/alpha: alpha_pci_io.c
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Add a cast of the shift count to int32_t, so
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Modified Files:
src/lib/libarch/alpha: alpha_pci_io.c
Log Message:
Add a cast of the shift count to int32_t, so that we don't try
to do int32_t << long, since ANSI C doesn't perform "balancing"
before the shift operation according to lint. Shoul
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:54:49AM +, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: he
> Date: Thu Mar 22 08:54:48 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libarch/alpha: alpha_pci_io.c
>
> Log Message:
> Add a cast of the shift count to int32_t, so that we don't try
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
