Module Name:src
Committed By: tsutsui
Date: Wed May 15 12:47:22 UTC 2024
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: main.c
Log Message:
Fix an old bug in NATIVELABEL_ONLY case in PR/50729 by me. (sigh)
'disklabel -r -w' writes a disklabel at a wrong sector in
NATIVELABEL_ONLY
Module Name:src
Committed By: tsutsui
Date: Wed May 15 12:47:22 UTC 2024
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: main.c
Log Message:
Fix an old bug in NATIVELABEL_ONLY case in PR/50729 by me. (sigh)
'disklabel -r -w' writes a disklabel at a wrong sector in
NATIVELABEL_ONLY
Module Name:src
Committed By: nia
Date: Wed Nov 3 14:25:39 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: interact.c main.c
Log Message:
disklabel(8): convert malloc(x * y) to reallocarr
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.39 -r1.40
Module Name:src
Committed By: nia
Date: Wed Nov 3 14:25:39 UTC 2021
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: interact.c main.c
Log Message:
disklabel(8): convert malloc(x * y) to reallocarr
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.39 -r1.40
Module Name:src
Committed By: isaki
Date: Sat Aug 3 04:21:37 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: main.c
Log Message:
Fix a trivial wrong comment. x68k's arch is not m68010.
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.52 -r1.53
Module Name:src
Committed By: isaki
Date: Sat Aug 3 04:21:37 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: main.c
Log Message:
Fix a trivial wrong comment. x68k's arch is not m68010.
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.52 -r1.53
Module Name:src
Committed By: wiz
Date: Tue Jul 2 16:47:20 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: disklabel.8
Log Message:
Sort and unify a bit. Add more macros.
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.69 -r1.70 src/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8
Please
Module Name:src
Committed By: mlelstv
Date: Tue Jul 2 16:23:48 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: disklabel.8 main.c
Log Message:
Add options to define labelsector and -offset and number of slices.
Make options to chose alternate label position for systems
Module Name:src
Committed By: mlelstv
Date: Tue Jul 2 16:23:48 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: disklabel.8 main.c
Log Message:
Add options to define labelsector and -offset and number of slices.
Make options to chose alternate label position for systems
htodd@ wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: htodd
Date: Sat Jul 18 06:00:46 UTC 2015
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: bswap.c
Log Message:
Fix build.
Ah, I tested it only in src/tools/disklabel. Thanks.
---
Izumi Tsutsui
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:48:03AM +0900, tsugutomo.en...@jp.sony.com wrote:
Christos Zoulas chris...@astron.com writes:
Are you worried about efficiency here? Yes, you can fix it differently
by checking if LABEL_OFFSET fits.
I don't worry about efficiency.
I've just noticed build
On May 15, 9:48am, tsugutomo.en...@jp.sony.com (tsugutomo.en...@jp.sony.com)
wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sbin/disklabel
| Christos Zoulas chris...@astron.com writes:
|
| Are you worried about efficiency here? Yes, you can fix it differently
| by checking if LABEL_OFFSET fits
In article tkr1u9a1ayw@sigxcpu.sm.sony.co.jp,
tsugutomo.en...@jp.sony.com wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: main.c
Log Message:
CVE 1020933: Prevent integer overflow by using wider type
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.33 -r1.34
Christos Zoulas chris...@astron.com writes:
Are you worried about efficiency here? Yes, you can fix it differently
by checking if LABEL_OFFSET fits.
I don't worry about efficiency.
I've just noticed build failure on i386, and wondering what was wrong.
I thought it would be better if warned
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: main.c
Log Message:
CVE 1020933: Prevent integer overflow by using wider type
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.33 -r1.34 src/sbin/disklabel/main.c
Since the variable `offset' in find_label() is used to express an offset
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: disklabel.8
Log Message:
mention that we don't handle more than 2TB disks/partitions.
I think the limit's actually (2**32 - 1) sectors. With
512-byte sectors, that's one sector less than 2TB.
--apb (Alan
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:56:24AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: disklabel.8
Log Message:
mention that we don't handle more than 2TB disks/partitions.
I think the limit's actually (2**32 - 1) sectors. With
Modified Files:
src/sbin/disklabel: interact.c main.c printlabel.c
Log Message:
Change printf formats to match the data type of the values being
printed. There's now a lot of PRIu16 and PRIu32, some PRIu8, some
SCNu32, and a few cases where %u and %d were reversed.
Probably you
18 matches
Mail list logo
