Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2014-06-30 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:00:59AM +, Darren Reed wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: darrenr Date: Sun Jun 29 04:00:59 UTC 2014 Modified Files: src/tests/ipf: t_nat_parse.sh Log Message: in2 is no longer a broken test case It still fails in our test runs. See

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2014-06-30 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: darrenr Date: Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014 Added Files: src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6 in101_6 in102_6 in1_6 in2_6 in3_6 in4_6 in5_6 in6_6 in8_6

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2014-06-30 Thread Darren Reed
On 1/07/2014 12:34 AM, Martin Husemann wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote: Module Name: src Committed By:darrenr Date:Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014 Added Files: src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6 in101_6 in102_6 in1_6 in2_6 in3_6

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2014-06-30 Thread Darren Reed
On 1/07/2014 12:34 AM, Martin Husemann wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote: Module Name: src Committed By:darrenr Date:Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014 Added Files: src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6 in101_6 in102_6 in1_6 in2_6 in3_6

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2014-06-30 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Darren Reed wrote: On 1/07/2014 12:34 AM, Martin Husemann wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 09:25:31AM +, Darren Reed wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: darrenr Date: Sun Jun 29 09:25:31 UTC 2014 Added Files: src/tests/ipf/expected: in100_6

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2014-06-30 Thread Darren Reed
On 1/07/2014 12:33 AM, Martin Husemann wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:00:59AM +, Darren Reed wrote: Module Name: src Committed By:darrenr Date:Sun Jun 29 04:00:59 UTC 2014 Modified Files: src/tests/ipf: t_nat_parse.sh Log Message: in2 is no longer a

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2012-07-07 Thread Paul Goyette
FWIW, this restores most of the ipfilter 5.1.1 tests that were disabled after the re-import (back in March). Remaining is one more test program, t_nat_exec, which has about 30 failing test cases (and 6 that succeed). I'm not sure how quickly I'll be able to investigate these, but I'll try to

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2012-03-27 Thread Alan Barrett
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: Modified Files: src/tests/ipf: t_filter_exec.sh t_filter_parse.sh t_nat_exec.sh t_nat_ipf_exec.sh Log Message: Mark the failing tests as broken. XXX: If no one is willing to maintain the ipf tests, these should be removed. I

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2012-03-27 Thread Cherry G. Mathew
On 27 March 2012 22:38, Alan Barrett a...@cequrux.com wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: Modified Files:        src/tests/ipf: t_filter_exec.sh t_filter_parse.sh t_nat_exec.sh            t_nat_ipf_exec.sh Log Message: Mark the failing tests as broken. XXX: If no one is

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2012-03-27 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote: Mark the failing tests as broken. XXX: If no one is willing to maintain the ipf tests, these should be removed. I object to this. If ipf fails its tests, then the fact should be made clear in the test reports, not hidden by

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/ipf

2012-03-27 Thread Paul Goyette
I think that this is failure of the tests. The tests were fixed at one point, right before the import of new version was reverted. It appears that the re-import has not quite caught up to the pre-revert state. On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:38:50PM