On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:22:51PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_mknod.c
Log Message:
Remove wrong check.
XXX: Why does this fail on tmpfs but not ffs?
That *should* fail. Probably ffs is failing to check.
--
David A. Holland
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 11:45:24PM +, David Holland wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:22:51PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_mknod.c
Log Message:
Remove wrong check.
XXX: Why does this fail on tmpfs but not ffs?
That *should*
On 5/29/11 1:57 PM, Matthias Scheler wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_pollts.c
Log Message:
[...]
Also use ATF_REQUIRE_EQ_MSG() instead of ATF_REQUIRE_MSG() to avoid
crashes if one of the required conditions isn't met.
It could be a bug in the macro. I tried changing the
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 02:57:14PM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
On 5/29/11 1:57 PM, Matthias Scheler wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_pollts.c
Log Message:
[...]
Also use ATF_REQUIRE_EQ_MSG() instead of ATF_REQUIRE_MSG() to avoid
crashes if one of the required
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:34:49AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sat May 28 15:34:49 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_pselect.c
Log Message:
add a timeout test
Your tests don't pass on my setup:
t_pselect
In article 20110528161614.ga71...@colwyn.zhadum.org.uk,
Matthias Scheler t...@zhadum.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:34:49AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:christos
Date:Sat May 28 15:34:49 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
On 5/22/11 12:48 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On May 22, 12:28am, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| That's what was done. But in order to enforce the timeouts et. al. this
| library had to fork() on every test case. This was really, really
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:30:24PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article 4dd39547.9010...@julipedia.org,
Julio Merino j...@julipedia.org wrote:
On 5/18/11 4:15 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Wed May 18 03:15:12 UTC 2011
In article 20110521083602.ga24...@netbsd.org,
Julio Merino j...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:30:24PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article 4dd39547.9010...@julipedia.org,
Julio Merino j...@julipedia.org wrote:
On 5/18/11 4:15 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:
On 5/21/11 3:19 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article20110521083602.ga24...@netbsd.org,
Julio Merinoj...@netbsd.org wrote:
1. It did not work. What units is the timeout anyway? I waited 2 seconds
and 2 minutes and it did not fire.
It's in seconds. The default is 300.
I think the unit
On May 21, 3:34pm, j...@netbsd.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| On 5/21/11 3:19 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| In article20110521083602.ga24...@netbsd.org,
| Julio Merinoj...@netbsd.org wrote:
| 1. It did not work. What units is the timeout anyway? I
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:34:22PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
Yes, the timeout thing is broken. It should really be a
specification of the test case size (e.g. 'small', 'large') and
allow the user to define his timeout preferences for every class,
because they will vary from machine to
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:34:22PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
Yes, the timeout thing is broken. It should really be a
specification of the test case size (e.g. 'small', 'large') and
allow the user to define his timeout
On May 21, 5:25pm, da...@l8s.co.uk (David Laight) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
| On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:34:22PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
| Yes, the timeout thing is broken. It should really
On 5/21/11 5:25 PM, David Laight wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 03:34:22PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
Yes, the timeout thing is broken. It should really be a
specification of the test case size (e.g. 'small', 'large') and
allow
On 05/21/11 15:44, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On May 21, 3:34pm, j...@netbsd.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| On 5/21/11 3:19 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| Revert the latest revision in the test and boot a kernel before the
pselect
| changes, and see
On May 21, 9:26pm, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| On 05/21/11 15:44, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| On May 21, 3:34pm, j...@netbsd.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
| -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
|
| | On 5/21/11 3:19 PM
On 05/21/11 21:58, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On May 21, 9:26pm, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| Just to make sure we are talking about the same: you were running the
| test program with atf-run; correct? If yes, what platform
On May 21, 10:31pm, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| Sounds like a good idea. Note that there is *many* more things that
| will not work. The test case will dump garbage in the current directory
| and it won't be cleaned, the environment
On 5/22/11 12:18 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On May 21, 10:31pm, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| Sounds like a good idea. Note that there is *many* more things that
| will not work. The test case will dump garbage in the current
On May 22, 12:28am, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/syscall
| atf-test-case(4) contains a description of these. (Yeah, it could be
| improved.)
Good.
| I don't see why. You just put it all in a shared library written in c and
| used from c
On 5/18/11 4:15 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Wed May 18 03:15:12 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_pselect.c
Log Message:
Don't depend on the atf timeout stuff, do it ourselves.
Why? Could atf do something better
In article 4dd39547.9010...@julipedia.org,
Julio Merino j...@julipedia.org wrote:
On 5/18/11 4:15 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:christos
Date:Wed May 18 03:15:12 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_pselect.c
Log Message:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:32:14AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:59:50AM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Check for getuid(2) == 0.
Why not setuid() to fix it?
That would indeed be the right thing to do. However, I am not quite sure how
atf(7) actually works. It
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:05:19AM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
Adding the following to the testcase header should do the trick:
atf_tc_set_md_var(tc,require.user,unprivileged);
In that case, if run as root, it will lower its privileges to the
unprivileged user _atf before running the
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:18:52AM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:05:19AM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
Adding the following to the testcase header should do the trick:
atf_tc_set_md_var(tc,require.user,unprivileged);
In that case, if run as root, it will
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:05:19AM +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
Adding the following to the testcase header should do the trick:
atf_tc_set_md_var(tc,require.user,unprivileged);
In that case, if run as root, it will lower its privileges to the
unprivileged user _atf before running the
In article 20110404014946.4b9e917...@cvs.netbsd.org,
Jukka Ruohonen source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Mon Apr 4 01:49:45 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/syscall: t_access.c
Log Message:
Check for getuid(2) == 0.
28 matches
Mail list logo
