Nia Alarie wrote in
<20230629214647.db217f...@cvs.netbsd.org>:
|Module Name: src
|Committed By: nia
|Date: Thu Jun 29 21:46:47 UTC 2023
|
|Modified Files:
| src/doc: CHANGES
|
|Log Message:
|ch-ch-changes
station to station
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The moon
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 3:11 PM, Simon Burge wrote:
>
> It can run either big- or little-endian, but has virtually no IO support
> whatsoever - just a UART and an extremely simple eithernet driver.
>
> I couldn't find any MIPS references to virtio with a quick look through
> the QEMU 5.0
Hi Reinoud,
Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:27:01AM +, Simon Burge wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: simonb
> > Date: Wed Jan 27 05:27:01 UTC 2021
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/doc: CHANGES
> >
> > Log Message:
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:27:01AM +, Simon Burge wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: simonb
> Date: Wed Jan 27 05:27:01 UTC 2021
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: CHANGES
>
> Log Message:
> Note support for QEMU "mipssim" emulator.
Is this machine also *able*
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: HACKS
thank you for keeping this upto date.
.mrg.
On 01.03.2020 22:36, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 10:20:44PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> If that will nor realize, I will request to enable GNU_HASH for NetBSD-11.
>
> You have so far demonstrated no justification at all beyond handwaving
> for why it should be
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 10:20:44PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> If that will nor realize, I will request to enable GNU_HASH for NetBSD-11.
You have so far demonstrated no justification at all beyond handwaving
for why it should be included in first place. Seriously, stop rushing
code without
On 29.02.2020 23:31, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:29:02PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 29.02.2020 21:58, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2020 19:00, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>>
On 29.02.2020 22:29, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 29.02.2020 21:58, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> On 29.02.2020 19:00, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: kamil
> Date: Sat Feb
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:29:02PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 29.02.2020 21:58, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> On 29.02.2020 19:00, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: kamil
>
On 29.02.2020 21:58, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 29.02.2020 19:00, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: kamil
Date: Sat Feb 29 04:27:01 UTC 2020
Modified Files:
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 29.02.2020 19:00, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> >> Module Name:src
> >> Committed By: kamil
> >> Date: Sat Feb 29 04:27:01 UTC 2020
> >>
> >> Modified Files:
> >> src/doc: CHANGES
> >>
> >> Log Message:
>
On 29.02.2020 19:29, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 06:00:29PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>>> Module Name:src
>>> Committed By: kamil
>>> Date: Sat Feb 29 04:27:01 UTC 2020
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>> src/doc: CHANGES
>>>
>>> Log Message:
>>>
On 29.02.2020 19:00, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>> Module Name:src
>> Committed By: kamil
>> Date: Sat Feb 29 04:27:01 UTC 2020
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/doc: CHANGES
>>
>> Log Message:
>> ld.elf_so(1): Implement DT_GNU_HASH
>
> Was this discussed anywhere?
In the
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 06:00:29PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: kamil
> > Date: Sat Feb 29 04:27:01 UTC 2020
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/doc: CHANGES
> >
> > Log Message:
> > ld.elf_so(1): Implement DT_GNU_HASH
>
> Was this
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: kamil
> Date: Sat Feb 29 04:27:01 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: CHANGES
>
> Log Message:
> ld.elf_so(1): Implement DT_GNU_HASH
Was this discussed anywhere? What are the advantages and drawbacks of
this over what we were doing
Yup, I have those in /etc/mk.conf.
HAVE_LLVM=yes
MKLLVM=yes
MKGCC=no
$ fgrep netbsd-clang /usr/src/make.sparc64-sparc64.release.out | head -4
--- sparc64--netbsd-clang ---
# link llvm-clang/sparc64--netbsd-clang
c++ -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing
On 20.02.2020 01:42, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Not reproducible:
As reported this needs specified:
-V MKLLVM=yes -V MKGCC=no -V HAVE_LLVM=yes
>
> build.sh command: ./build.sh -P -U -E -x -m sparc64 -a
> sparc64 -D /usr/obj/sparc64-sparc64/release -R
> /usr/obj/sparc64-sparc64/media
Not reproducible:
build.sh command:./build.sh -P -U -E -x -m sparc64 -a sparc64 -D
/usr/obj/sparc64-sparc64/release -R /usr/obj/sparc64-sparc64/media -j 40 release
build.sh started:Wed Feb 19 15:27:23 EST 2020
NetBSD version: 9.99.47
MACHINE:
On Feb 19, 5:09pm, n...@gmx.com (Kamil Rytarowski) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/doc
| On 19.02.2020 16:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
| > On 18.02.2020 22:14, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| >> Module Name: src
| >> Committed By: christos
| >> Date:
On 19.02.2020 16:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 18.02.2020 22:14, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:christos
>> Date:Tue Feb 18 21:14:16 UTC 2020
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/doc: 3RDPARTY CHANGES
>>
>> Log Message:
>> new awk
>>
>>
>> To
On 18.02.2020 22:14, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Tue Feb 18 21:14:16 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: 3RDPARTY CHANGES
>
> Log Message:
> new awk
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.1690 -r1.1691
On 19.01.2020 07:57, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: thorpej
> Date: Sun Jan 19 06:57:39 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: CHANGES
>
> Log Message:
> Note removal of HIPPI support.
Thanks!
Please keep in sync src/doc/TODO.smpnet.
signature.asc
In article <20191114162726.b55f7f...@cvs.netbsd.org>,
Maxime Villard wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Module Name: src
>Committed By: maxv
>Date: Thu Nov 14 16:27:26 UTC 2019
>
>Modified Files:
> src/doc: CHANGES
>
>Log Message:
>Note kMSan.
>
Very nice!
christos
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:08:55AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> "Jared D. McNeill" writes:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: jmcneill
> > Date: Thu Oct 17 09:38:07 UTC 2019
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/doc: CHANGES
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Amazon Graviton
"Jared D. McNeill" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jmcneill
> Date: Thu Oct 17 09:38:07 UTC 2019
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: CHANGES
>
> Log Message:
> Amazon Graviton support is in 9.0, remove the changes entry.
is it in CHANGES.prev? entries should move from
I wonder if this would make a good GSOC project?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: pgoyette
Date: Wed Feb 20 04:32:51 UTC 2019
Modified Files:
src/doc: TODO.modules
Log Message:
Add an entry to remind someone(tm) to review the need
Christos Zoulas wrote in <20190108184053.e22c1f...@cvs.netbsd.org>:
|Module Name: src
|Committed By: christos
|Date: Tue Jan 8 18:40:53 UTC 2019
|
|Modified Files:
| src/doc: 3RDPARTY
|
|Log Message:
|- put all the GPLv3 software together
|- put all the Last GPLv2 version
On Sep 30, 1:07am, t...@back-street.net (Takahiro Kambe) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/doc
| In message <20180812130741.848c9f...@cvs.netbsd.org>
| on Sun, 12 Aug 2018 09:07:41 -0400,
| "Christos Zoulas" wrote:
| > Module Name:src
| > Commit
In message <20180812130741.848c9f...@cvs.netbsd.org>
on Sun, 12 Aug 2018 09:07:41 -0400,
"Christos Zoulas" wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Sun Aug 12 13:07:41 UTC 2018
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: 3RDPARTY CHANGES
>
> Log Message:
>
On 15/08/2018 16:11, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: sevan
> Date: Wed Aug 15 15:11:18 UTC 2018
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: 3RDPARTY
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.1547 -r1.1548 src/doc/3RDPARTY
>
> Please note that diffs
Hello,
Sevan Janiyan wrote in <20180806224530.0eb41f...@cvs.netbsd.org>:
|Module Name: src
|Committed By: sevan
|Date: Mon Aug 6 22:45:29 UTC 2018
|
|Modified Files:
| src/doc: 3RDPARTY
|
|Log Message:
|Update current version info for IANA services & protocols databases.
|
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 04:17:44PM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: wiz
> Date: Sun Jan 8 16:17:44 UTC 2017
>
> Modified Files:
> src/doc: 3RDPARTY
>
> Log Message:
> zlib-1.2.9 out.
>
1.2.10 is out
On 02.01.2017 18:54, David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 05:18:49AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > > Historically exect() is used by debuggers to start debuggees. While
> > > it's equivalent to using PT_TRACE_ME followed by execve(), I think the
> > > result is that the new
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 05:18:49AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > Historically exect() is used by debuggers to start debuggees. While
> > it's equivalent to using PT_TRACE_ME followed by execve(), I think the
> > result is that the new process first stops immediately after the exec
> >
On 02.01.2017 04:44, David Holland wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 08:57:16PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > Update TODO.ptrace
> >
> > Mark exect(3) for removal, there is no use-case for it. exec() is already
> > monitored and emits SIGTRAP when traced.
>
> Historically exect() is used
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 08:57:16PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Update TODO.ptrace
>
> Mark exect(3) for removal, there is no use-case for it. exec() is already
> monitored and emits SIGTRAP when traced.
Historically exect() is used by debuggers to start debuggees. While
it's equivalent
Am 20.05.13 11:31, schrieb Thomas Klausner:
Module Name: src
Committed By: wiz
Date: Mon May 20 09:31:31 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/doc: 3RDPARTY
Log Message:
lua-5.2.2 out (mbalmer!!)
Actually I am working on that. For base and pkgsrc...
So stay tuned ;)
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 05:46:20AM +, Tetsuya Isaki wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: isaki
Date: Sat Apr 20 05:46:20 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/doc: CHANGES
Log Message:
m68k FPE supports all mathematics functions.
How much chocolate would we need to get you
At Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:37:08 +0200,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: isaki
Date: Sat Apr 20 05:46:20 UTC 2013
Modified Files:
src/doc: CHANGES
Log Message:
m68k FPE supports all mathematics functions.
How much chocolate
On Mar 2, 2012, at 12:41 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
tzcode2012b and tzdata2012b ahve been released.
We have updated to tzdata2012b.
What was the resolution with the patent issues and whatnot?
The lawsuit was withdrawn after it became obvious that
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:06:31AM +, Alan Barrett wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: apb
Date: Fri Mar 2 07:06:31 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
src/doc: 3RDPARTY
Log Message:
tzcode2012b and tzdata2012b ahve been released.
We have updated to tzdata2012b.
What was
In article 20101121200907.ga10...@cs.hut.fi,
Antti Kantee po...@cs.hut.fi wrote:
- handle setuid and unsetuid the posix way instead of setresuid()
- add all missing functions
- always bump major when importing to avoid api problems.
+- disabled roaming reconnect
Any reason you bumped
Fix last 2 commits.
Ah, sorry bad pasto.
---
Izumi Tsutsui
On Friday 12 November 2010 17:36:57 Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Fix last 2 commits.
Ah, sorry bad pasto.
It helped me spot my typo. :)
---
Izumi Tsutsui
Nick
Are there any specific problems or (even better) PRs for this
brokenness?
PR port-hpcmips/43738.
In general, (not specific at all ;p)
- post-your-fix kernel + pre-mips64-merge userland work fine
- post-your-fix kernel + post-mips64-merge userland don't work
on mips ports I
Mention mips64 support (from the first branch merge) by matt@,
so details wont be forgotten in the release notes.
IMO, no one will forget it because all mips ports have been broken
since the merge and we won't get the next release unless it's fixed.
Anyway, if you would like to
Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Mention mips64 support (from the first branch merge) by matt@,
so details wont be forgotten in the release notes.
IMO, no one will forget it because all mips ports have been broken
since the merge and we won't get the next release unless it's fixed.
Anyway, if you
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:32:12PM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: wiz
Date: Wed Oct 21 22:32:11 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/doc: 3RDPARTY
Log Message:
Add entry for mdocml with joerg as responsible person.
Nu mach mal keinen Stress :)
Am 02.10.2009 um 09:43 schrieb Christoph Egger:
Module Name:src
Committed By: cegger
Date: Fri Oct 2 07:43:01 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/doc: BUILDING.mdoc CHANGES.prev
src/doc/roadmaps: storage
Log Message:
backout wrong changes after I got teached that
On Friday 2009-10-02 07:17 +, Christoph Egger output:
:Module Name: src
:Committed By: cegger
:Date: Fri Oct 2 07:17:16 UTC 2009
:
:Modified Files:
: src/doc: BUILDING.mdoc CHANGES CHANGES.prev
: src/doc/roadmaps: storage
:
:Log Message:
:fix grammar: a - an
:
:To
Geoff Wing wrote:
On Friday 2009-10-02 07:17 +, Christoph Egger output:
:Module Name: src
:Committed By:cegger
:Date:Fri Oct 2 07:17:16 UTC 2009
:
:Modified Files:
: src/doc: BUILDING.mdoc CHANGES CHANGES.prev
: src/doc/roadmaps: storage
:
:Log
On Oct 2, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
Index: src/doc/BUILDING.mdoc
diff -u src/doc/BUILDING.mdoc:1.77 src/doc/BUILDING.mdoc:1.78
--- src/doc/BUILDING.mdoc:1.77 Sun Sep 27 18:08:24 2009
+++ src/doc/BUILDING.mdoc Fri Oct 2 07:17:16 2009
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@
.Sy /bin/sh
is
Hi !
I tried a kernel from today (20090530).
Strangely cups/foomatic fails with EBADF when attempting to read
from STDIN in the foomatic perl script. A kernel from 20090516 works.
Userland is from 20090516. Have there been library changes or is a bug
hiding the in descriptor changes ? The
54 matches
Mail list logo
