Re: CVS commit: src
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Adam Hamsik h...@netbsd.org wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: haad Date: Sat Jan 1 13:09:13 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/distrib/sets/lists/base: mi src/etc/mtree: NetBSD.dist.base Log Message: Add /var/lock/lvm subdir for LVM it can be created automagically but I think that it's better to have it created before. This broke the build: http://www.gson.org/netbsd/bugs/build/build/2011.01.01.20.43.01/build.log.tail -- Julio Merino
Re: CVS commit: src/etc/mtree
On Jan,Saturday 1 2011, at 11:11 PM, Adam Hamsik wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: haad Date: Sat Jan 1 22:11:45 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/etc/mtree: NetBSD.dist.base Log Message: Remove optional keyword from directory definition. This fixes PR misc/44308 Regards Adam.
Re: CVS commit: src
On Jan,Saturday 1 2011, at 11:40 PM, Julio Merino wrote: On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Adam Hamsik h...@netbsd.org wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: haad Date: Sat Jan 1 13:09:13 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/distrib/sets/lists/base: mi src/etc/mtree: NetBSD.dist.base Log Message: Add /var/lock/lvm subdir for LVM it can be created automagically but I think that it's better to have it created before. This broke the build: http://www.gson.org/netbsd/bugs/build/build/2011.01.01.20.43.01/build.log.tail Should be fixed now. Thanks for noticing. Sorry for breakage. Regards Adam.
Re: CVS commit: src/etc/powerd/scripts
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:51:24PM -0600, David Young wrote: IMO, we should put the system to sleep by sending a power-saving/wakeup-latency goal and a set of waking events (e.g., keystroke, mouse movement, LAN activity) to the root device_t using drvctl. To put any smaller set of devices to sleep, send the goal wake events to some subtree. FWIW, the sleep states that ACPI names are not sufficient even to describe all of the potential sleep states of ACPI hardware. I have a laptop that's perfectly capable of an S3-like sleep, but the ACPI BIOS doesn't support S3, and the HDD is not formatted properly for the S4 sleep. I would still make the distinction between system sleep and device sleep. It seems to me that you describe above the latter. In the former you still need to call the machine-dependent suspend-sequences at some point. There is nothing quite like ACPI when it comes to jargon. The actual device power states are represented as D-states, which range from D0 (fully on) to D3 (fully off). If I recall correctly, the same abstraction is used in the USB or PCI specifications. As I've noted before, we lack a representation for this in device_t. - Jukka.
Re: CVS commit: src/tests/fs/common
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:02:00PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote: It is possible that netbsd's nfs server does additional checks but they are expensive to do on every nfs request. That's good advise to someone who is configuring an nfs server. ...which is to say, it's not relevant to this test; a readonly mount on the client should still be readonly regardless of what the server export permissions allow. It would also be worthwhile to test that nfsd doesn't allow writing via read-only handles, but that's a different issue and will require a different test framework that sends raw nfs packets. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
Re: CVS commit: src/tests/fs/common
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 05:22:32AM +, David Holland wrote: It would also be worthwhile to test that nfsd doesn't allow writing via read-only handles, but that's a different issue and will require a different test framework that sends raw nfs packets. Hmm, no, maybe I misunderstood. Anyway, the mountd permissions issue is PR 3019, the longest-lived-without-attention bug in the whole bug database. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
