On 17.07.2011 23:18, David Laight wrote:
The .byte streams are required for the inclusion of the AES NI
instructions, which are not supported with our current gcc version.
Should be fixed once we have stabilized gcc 4.5 (dunno about other
compilers though, especially pcc).
That doesn't make
In article 20110717232910.de94317...@cvs.netbsd.org,
David Young source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Module Name: src
Committed By: dyoung
Date: Sun Jul 17 23:29:10 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/sparc/include: types.h
src/sys/arch/sparc/sparc:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 04:51:41PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/sys: dup.2
Log Message:
Note that dup2(2) and dup3(2) may not fail with EMFILE; from PR lib/45148.
What happens if the 'new' file number is above RLIMIT_NOFILES?
dunno.
And what
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:44:53PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article 20110717232910.de94317...@cvs.netbsd.org,
David Young source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Module Name: src
Committed By:dyoung
Date:Sun Jul 17 23:29:10 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
On 18.07.2011 02:00, David Young wrote:
Can we please use ansi function definitions in newly committed code?
This was tedious enough without converting to ANSI function definitions.
A good job for Coccinelle (spatch)?
Sadly, no: last time I tried (when moving kvm(3) code to ANSI style), I
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:02:27PM +, David A. Holland wrote:
Modified Files:
src/sys/ufs/ufs: ufs_vnops.c
Log Message:
At the end of ufs_rmdir, don't use a dangling vnode pointer to call
fstrans_done. Ok hannken@
Well, for the record it turns out I misread his mail and
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 03:33:56PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: dyoung
Date: Sun Jul 17 01:08:12 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/alpha/include: sysarch.h
Log Message:
Don't #include machine/bus_defs.h from
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:26:59AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
making port-alpha build by simply removing what isn't building is the
wrong answer, unless you're positive that is the right thing to do.
This was rather poor phrasing, wasn't it?
Dave
--
David Young OJC Technologies
