On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:42:42PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 10.10.2017 13:27, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:03:42AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:02:48AM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
> >>> I think you are confusing things. We do not
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:12:32PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> I'm not randomly seeking out code to delete. I was poking at nearby code
> due to a bug report. I saw dead code, so I deleted it. I have some more
> changes to nearby code that I haven't committed / was debating.
It wasn't dead code.
I'm not randomly seeking out code to delete. I was poking at nearby code
due to a bug report. I saw dead code, so I deleted it. I have some more
changes to nearby code that I haven't committed / was debating.
On 10.10.2017 13:27, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:03:42AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:02:48AM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
>>> I think you are confusing things. We do not support FPU emulation in the
>>> kernel, but booting on FPU-less machines
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:03:42AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:02:48AM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > I think you are confusing things. We do not support FPU emulation in the
> > kernel, but booting on FPU-less machines should still work (with a softfloat
> > userlan
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:02:48AM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
> I think you are confusing things. We do not support FPU emulation in the
> kernel, but booting on FPU-less machines should still work (with a softfloat
> userland).
I don't think we should support every esoteric case just in case s