Le 08/08/2018 à 20:13, Ryo Shimizu a écrit :
It would be nice to set SCTLR_EL1.WXN, by the way.
Yes, It is easy. But should this be synchronized with
security.pax.mprotect.enabled? If so, we need a md-hook in the sysctl helper
of pax.mprotect.enable.
Ah, I misunderstood the meaning of
m...@netbsd.org writes:
> Can we use aprint_debug instead?
it's not an autoconf message, so, please don't use aprint*().
.mrg.
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 07:50:13AM +, Simon Burge wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: simonb
> > Date: Wed Aug 8 07:50:12
>Also, why don't we tag each userland page with LX_BLKPAG_PXN?
Oh... I overlooked that.
Certainly, no userland page should not be set executable for kernel. I'll fix.
>It would be nice to set SCTLR_EL1.WXN, by the way.
Yes, It is easy. But should this be synchronized with
Le 04/08/2018 à 17:24, Ryo Shimizu a écrit :
Maybe we should just pass the protection bits in l2_setblocks, and map the
kernel text/rodata as RO right away. It would also make it possible to map
rodata/data as non executable, with PXN|UXN. (Looking at the code it seems
to me rodata/data are
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 10:22:33PM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:11:39PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:49:21AM +, m...@netbsd.org
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:11:39PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:49:21AM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Can we use aprint_debug instead?
It is not even
Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:11:39PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:49:21AM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> > > > Can we use aprint_debug instead?
> > >
> > > It is not
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:11:39PM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:49:21AM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> > > Can we use aprint_debug instead?
> >
> > It is not even usefull for general debugging
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:49:21AM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> > Can we use aprint_debug instead?
>
> It is not even usefull for general debugging IMHO.
>
> Martin
I like the idea of removing the messages entirely. The code
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:49:21AM +, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
> Can we use aprint_debug instead?
It is not even usefull for general debugging IMHO.
Martin
Can we use aprint_debug instead?
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 07:50:13AM +, Simon Burge wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: simonb
> Date: Wed Aug 8 07:50:12 UTC 2018
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/mips/mips: cpu_exec.c
>
> Log Message:
> Make change of ABI printf()s
11 matches
Mail list logo