Kamil Rytarowski writes:
> [...]
> ./build.sh tools for LLVM is broken when host ships with no terminfo
> devel libraries. I tried to disable this superfluous feature for tools
> (for colors in a terminal), but it got reverted (breaking TNF rules) here.
> [...]
Apart possible technical arguments,
On 21.02.2020 09:17, Leonardo Taccari wrote:
> Kamil Rytarowski writes:
>> [...]
>> ./build.sh tools for LLVM is broken when host ships with no terminfo
>> devel libraries. I tried to disable this superfluous feature for tools
>> (for colors in a terminal), but it got reverted (breaking TNF rules)
On 21.02.2020 07:20, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:01:45AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> I consider calling ncurses-dev essential as a bug.
>
> My knee jerk reaction was: if a unix compiler needs terminfo (especially
> when it only does that to create coloured unreadable
On 20.02.2020 22:14, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jdolecek
> Date: Thu Feb 20 21:14:23 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: subr_autoconf.c
>
> Log Message:
> protect deferred lists' manipulation by config_misc_lock, same as
> config_pending sem
On 22.12.2019 20:47, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: ad
> Date: Sun Dec 22 19:47:35 UTC 2019
>
> Modified Files:
> src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/fs/zfs: zfs_ctldir.c
> src/sys/kern: vfs_mount.c vfs_subr.c vfs_syscalls.c
> src/sys/miscfs/g
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:13:24 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> This patch changes cryptic failure in linking to a verbose message:
>
> http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00231-llvm-terminfo-tools.txt
>
> Does it look to commit?
The "devel library" is linux-specific terminology.
There's no need f
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:13:24AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 21.02.2020 07:20, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:01:45AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> I consider calling ncurses-dev essential as a bug.
> >
> > My knee jerk reaction was: if a unix compiler needs
> Disable ubsan instrumentation on the operation.
+#if defined(__clang__)
+__attribute__((no_sanitize("undefined")))
+#else
+__attribute__((no_sanitize_undefined))
+#endif
can we get a __disable_sanitizer or something i cdefs.h?
.mrg.
On 21.02.2020 23:53, matthew green wrote:
>> Disable ubsan instrumentation on the operation.
>
> +#if defined(__clang__)
> +__attribute__((no_sanitize("undefined")))
> +#else
> +__attribute__((no_sanitize_undefined))
> +#endif
>
> can we get a __disable_sanitizer or something i cdefs.h?
>
>
> .
Really, the tests/modules directory should be only used for tests-that-
relate-to-module-functionality. It should NOT be used for modules-
that-support-tests-of-other-functionality.
In the future, please do not put support modules here; put them in the
samae place as the tests that they support
OK, I over-reacted and didn't completely read the original commit
message.
The t_builtin.c stuff is indeed a test-of-module-functionality
so it does belong here.
But some of the other stuff here does not belong, such as the
threadpool, fetchstore, and kcov stuff. As far as I can see,
those al
11 matches
Mail list logo
