At Fri, 01 May 2020 15:41:14 +1000,
matthew green wrote:
> > > .. I mean, if it's a "tuneable" value like this rather than a constant
> > > like
> > > __HAVE_SLOW_COMPUTER. :-)
> >
> > I see. I like this feeling. (not strong opinion too though)
> > How about you, mrg@?
>
> works for me. i lik
We can setup an equivalence: put as much effort into the SCTP removal
proposal as there was for the SCTP introduction proposal.
Since SCTP was just dropped in src without any prior discussion, I don't
think we need any discussion for removing it.
Plus to confirm reverting just this commit from today's github copy of
current (d5b32e03eac8b05d38a143ee0ec615efb2233201) boots fine on the
T480
Thanks
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 00:12, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>
> David Brownlee wrote:
> > Just another data point - seeing this same panic on a T480
Hi,
Have you missed this thread?
If the problem requires more time to investigate,
could you consider to revert ata change for a while?
Thank you.
Alexander Nasonov writes:
> David Brownlee wrote:
>> Just another data point - seeing this same panic on a T480 with the
>> latest kernel from nyf