Hi,
Have you missed this thread?
If the problem requires more time to investigate,
could you consider to revert ata change for a while?
Thank you.
Alexander Nasonov writes:
> David Brownlee wrote:
>> Just another data point - seeing this same panic on a T480 with the
>> latest kernel from
Plus to confirm reverting just this commit from today's github copy of
current (d5b32e03eac8b05d38a143ee0ec615efb2233201) boots fine on the
T480
Thanks
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 00:12, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>
> David Brownlee wrote:
> > Just another data point - seeing this same panic on a T480
We can setup an equivalence: put as much effort into the SCTP removal
proposal as there was for the SCTP introduction proposal.
Since SCTP was just dropped in src without any prior discussion, I don't
think we need any discussion for removing it.
At Fri, 01 May 2020 15:41:14 +1000,
matthew green wrote:
> > > .. I mean, if it's a "tuneable" value like this rather than a constant
> > > like
> > > __HAVE_SLOW_COMPUTER. :-)
> >
> > I see. I like this feeling. (not strong opinion too though)
> > How about you, mrg@?
>
> works for me. i
