On Fri, 03 Apr 2009, Soren Jacobsen wrote:
> On 04/04 00:47, Alan Barrett wrote:
> > I have committed a change to make "mtree -C" sort its output. I think
> > we can now remove sort incovations from shell scripts or make rules that
> > invoke mtree -C.
>
> That's fine, but for 5.0 I'd rather just
On 04/04 00:47, Alan Barrett wrote:
>
> I have committed a change to make "mtree -C" sort its output. I think
> we can now remove sort incovations from shell scripts or make rules that
> invoke mtree -C.
That's fine, but for 5.0 I'd rather just have the additional sort
invocation in maketars.
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> a...@cequrux.com wrote:
> > I think it would be better to do this in the sanitise_METALOG target in
> > src/distrib/sets/Makefile, like this:
>
> But it is not confiremd yet that using METALOG.sanitised is okay or not.
Oh, I see that the makesetfiles ta
Izumi Tsutsui writes:
> Did you commit your change without build and test? ;-p
No, I did a test build. I just noted that when I re-ordered things they
got re-reordered by mtree, but I didn't look into it much.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
pe...@piermont.com wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Explicitly sort entries on preparing set files from METALOG.
> > METALOG could have different order due to install(1) race
> > on parallel builds, and mtree(8) doesn't sort files.
> > Should fix inconsistent shared sets among builds as seen in
> > /pu
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:55:36PM -0700, Tom Spindler wrote:
> > src/share/man/man9: scsipi.9
> > Continue my crusade - queueing -> queuing
>
> A crusade against British English?
That's British English? Well I'll be damned.
Anyway, the reason I changed it is because the ATA-7 standard and
I
Alan Barrett writes:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> Alan Barrett writes:
>> > It would also make sense to add a sort option to mtree.
>>
>> Does mtree -C sort already? I haven't read the sources but it seems to
>> rearrange what it is fed into a canonicalized order.
>
> No, i
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Alan Barrett writes:
> > It would also make sense to add a sort option to mtree.
>
> Does mtree -C sort already? I haven't read the sources but it seems to
> rearrange what it is fed into a canonicalized order.
No, it doesn't sort; whatever rearrang
Alan Barrett writes:
> It would also make sense to add a sort option to mtree.
Does mtree -C sort already? I haven't read the sources but it seems to
rearrange what it is fed into a canonicalized order.
Perry
Izumi Tsutsui writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: tsutsui
> Date: Thu Apr 2 23:06:16 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/distrib/sets: maketars
>
> Log Message:
> Explicitly sort entries on preparing set files from METALOG.
> METALOG could have different order due to install
a...@cequrux.com wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Apr 2009, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Explicitly sort entries on preparing set files from METALOG.
> > METALOG could have different order due to install(1) race
> > on parallel builds, and mtree(8) doesn't sort files.
> > Should fix inconsistent s
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> Log Message:
> Explicitly sort entries on preparing set files from METALOG.
> METALOG could have different order due to install(1) race
> on parallel builds, and mtree(8) doesn't sort files.
> Should fix inconsistent shared sets among builds as seen in
>
Whoops. the commit message below should've said "no functional change
apart from new bugs".
patched, thanks.
On Fri Apr 03 2009 at 00:37:43 +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
>
> 'sa' in mount_nfs_dogetargs will be out of the scope when it's used.
>
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> > Module Name:
13 matches
Mail list logo
