Re: CVS commit: [matt-nb5-mips64] src/sys/arch/evbmips/conf

2009-08-26 Thread David Young
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:47:29AM +, Matt Thomas wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: matt Date: Wed Aug 26 04:47:29 UTC 2009 Modified Files: src/sys/arch/evbmips/conf [matt-nb5-mips64]: MALTA32 MALTA64 Log Message: Add no ath* since we have no Atheros HAL for

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/i386/conf

2009-08-26 Thread David Holland
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:01:39AM -0400, Elad Efrat wrote: Log Message: Build NiLFS(2). (2)? :-p That's how it's written in the configuration file... That seems... odd. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dist/ipf/netinet

2009-08-26 Thread David Holland
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:08:00PM +, Christoph Egger wrote: Modified Files: src/sys/dist/ipf/netinet: ip_compat.h Log Message: build fix: caddr_t - void * To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.25 -r1.26 src/sys/dist/ipf/netinet/ip_compat.h Why should this

Re: CVS commit: src

2009-08-26 Thread David Holland
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:23:39AM -0400, Elad Efrat wrote: Unrelated to the topic of the thread, but kmem(9) says: SECURITY CONSIDERATION As the memory allocated by kmem_alloc() is uninitialized, it can contain security-sensitive data left by its previous user. It is the

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/net

2009-08-26 Thread David Holland
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:17:56PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 09:10:07PM +, David Holland wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: I was thinking about that, too. I could add a 'name' node, too:

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/common/bus_dma

2009-08-26 Thread David Holland
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:30:06AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: Add some common bus_dmamem routines to be shared by multiple platforms. Do these really need to be in their own private directory? (whose name, I might add, is confusing in the presence of src/common...) This is intended to be

Re: CVS commit: src

2009-08-26 Thread Elad Efrat
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, David Hollanddholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote: Entities that share the same memory space inherently have the same trust level. At that point it becomes a nonissue, except for e.g. cryptographic keys that should already be getting handled properly. I'm not clear

Re: CVS commit: src

2009-08-26 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Hello, y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: hi, what's the status of this? in case it was not clear, i want you revert the changes. It does not change the way how other (and older) section 9 man pages are written, it rather makes our man pages consistent. And I strongly prefer