Re: CVS commit: src/gnu/dist/gdb6/gdb

2009-11-28 Thread David Laight
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:29:43AM +0900, enami tsugutomo wrote: i wonder if we can re-add proc0paddr, defined to be = lwp0.l_addr at some point in main, to help this work with older gdb? this seems like a worth-while change since it's part of bsd-kvm.c. would need to be in md

Re: CVS commit: src/gnu/dist/gdb6/gdb

2009-11-28 Thread enami tsugutomo
The above is defining a global symbol that referes to the middle of a struct, not setting a memory location to the address of the it. Do you mean lwp0.l_addr may vary during execution? enami.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/compat

2009-11-28 Thread David Laight
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:21:30PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: Are you sure about the PR? should have been 31368 :-( David -- David Laight: da...@l8s.co.uk

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/net

2009-11-28 Thread Tetsuya Isaki
At Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:23:44 +0100, Marc Balmer wrote: + case ETHERTYPE_AARP: /* probably this should be done with a NETISR as well */ - aarpinput(ifp, m); /* XXX */ - return; + arpinput(ifp, m); /* XXX