On Thursday 29 April 2010 17:02:50 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:12:21PM +, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> > Module Name: src
> > Committed By: sjg
> > Date: Thu Apr 29 23:12:21 UTC 2010
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/usr.bin/make: main.c parse.c
> >
> > Lo
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:12:21PM +, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: sjg
> Date: Thu Apr 29 23:12:21 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/usr.bin/make: main.c parse.c
>
> Log Message:
> fflush stdout, before writing to stderr.
In which situation does
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:52:16AM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Also annoying that so much of this code is MD.
>
> Please run large x86 changes by me before commit. I would have told you
> what Matt just did :-). FYI you can now remove the #error from both busfunc.S
> and special _ALIGN_TEXT def
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:31:11 +
Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jruoho
> Date: Thu Apr 29 16:31:11 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: signal.9
>
> Log Message:
> Update this, mechanically, to match the new functions and their prototypes
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:05:02PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > What's the currently-blessed alternative?
>
> 2004:
>
> APPLICATION USAGE
>
> "For applications portability, the utime() function should be used to set
> file access and modification times instead of utimes()."
oh goody
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:51:19AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:14:35AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > Note that utimes(2) no longer enjoys the blessing of POSIX.
>
> What's the currently-blessed alternative?
2004:
APPLICATION USAGE
"For applications portability,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:39:50AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
>
>Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64: busfunc.S genassym.cf mainbus.c
> src/sys/arch/i386/i386: apmbios.c busfunc.S genassym.cf ipkdb_glue.c
> mainbus.c
> src/sys/arch/i386/isa: isapnp_machde
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:14:35AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> Note that utimes(2) no longer enjoys the blessing of POSIX.
What's the currently-blessed alternative?
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
Hi!
From: Adam Hoka
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:38:31 +0200
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:56:00 +
> KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
>
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: kiyohara
> > Date: Thu Apr 29 06:56:00 UTC 2010
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/dev/ieee1394: f
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:56:00 +
KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: kiyohara
> Date: Thu Apr 29 06:56:00 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev/ieee1394: fwdma.c
>
> Log Message:
> Call malloc(M_ZERO) instead of malloc() and memset().
Why not kmem_z
10 matches
Mail list logo