Re: CVS commit: [netbsd-5] src/lib/libpthread
On May 20, 2010, at 5:31 PM, Takahiro Kambe wrote: > In message <20100520050207.9927e17...@cvs.netbsd.org> > on Thu, 20 May 2010 05:02:07 +, > Soren Jacobsen wrote: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By:snj >> Date:Thu May 20 05:02:07 UTC 2010 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/lib/libpthread [netbsd-5]: pthread.c >> >> Log Message: >> Pull up following revision(s) (requested by explorer in ticket #1353): >> lib/libpthread/pthread.c: revision 1.114, 1.115 >> Correctly set pt_lid in the child, after a fork >> -- >> fix the pthread pt_lid in the fork callback function that runs in the >> child instead of a function that may be going away. KNFify > > I'm very happy with this. > > Should this change be pulled up to netbsd-5-0 branch? No, just netbsd-5. At this time, we are being strict, and netbsd-5-0 is only getting changes that deserve security advisories.
Re: CVS commit: [netbsd-5] src/lib/libpthread
Hi, In message <20100520050207.9927e17...@cvs.netbsd.org> on Thu, 20 May 2010 05:02:07 +, Soren Jacobsen wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: snj > Date: Thu May 20 05:02:07 UTC 2010 > > Modified Files: > src/lib/libpthread [netbsd-5]: pthread.c > > Log Message: > Pull up following revision(s) (requested by explorer in ticket #1353): > lib/libpthread/pthread.c: revision 1.114, 1.115 > Correctly set pt_lid in the child, after a fork > -- > fix the pthread pt_lid in the fork callback function that runs in the > child instead of a function that may be going away. KNFify I'm very happy with this. Should this change be pulled up to netbsd-5-0 branch? -- Takahiro Kambe
Re: CVS commit: src/sys/rump/librump/rumpkern
On Thu May 20 2010 at 02:47:16 +, David Holland wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:29:36PM +, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > It's pretty obvious that in terms of scalability simple workload
> > partitioning and replication into multiple kernels wins hands down
> > over complicated locking or locklessing algorithms which depend on
> > globally atomic state.
>
> ...in other breaking news, the sky is blue.
Yet it is not possible everywhere to observe the sky being blue due to
various layers of unnecessary crap.
> :-p :-)
?:-% ('\/)
