On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Holland
wrote:
>
> The way some of the tests are organized suggests that the intended
> model is one test program per test victim (or per test victim and
> substantially different testing harness) and then one test case per
> bug affecting that victim.
>
> Is
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:43:14PM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
> Seconded! With even a modest amount of tests our file systems should
> start behaving dramatically better. Before it was easy'ish to partially
> test one file system after a global change by recompiling kernel,
> rebooting, and r
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Nicolas Joly wrote:
>
> The main idea behind this was to have, except for the exercizing code,
> a one liner test.
>
> func() {}
> ATF_FSAPPLY(func, "func description")
>
> Not using the ATF_FSAPPLY macro, it becomes :
>
> func() {}
>
> ATF_TC_FSAPPLY(func, "descrip
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:10:12PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> > Module Name: src
> > Committed By: njoly
> > Date: Mon Jul 5 12:53:59 UTC 2010
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/distrib/sets/lists/tests: mi
> > src/
On Mon Jul 05 2010 at 14:10:12 +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Add test program that use sample code from kern/41937, and fs rump
> > helpers to check currently supported filesystems.
> >
> > t_rmdirrace (1/1): 5 test cases
> > ext2fs_race: Passed.
> > ffs_race: Passed.
> >
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: njoly
> Date: Mon Jul 5 12:53:59 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/distrib/sets/lists/tests: mi
> src/etc/mtree: NetBSD.dist.base
> src/tests/fs: Makefile
> Added Files:
>
