Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libperfuse
Lubomir Sedlacik wrote: > > There is "per" instead of "re" in the name :-) > Perhaps "con" would've been more appropriate, given the reactions. :) You will have to find a meaning for that one! The confusion was expected, as we now have two high level FUSE API. Here is a little sketch that may be worth a long explanation FUSE filesystemsmore FUSE filesystems ^ ^ | | high-level FUSE interface| || | librefuse libfuse > low level FUSE interface || |kernel level FUSE interface(*) ---> glusterfs || | perfused || | libperfuse || +-- libpuffs ---+ | kernel (*) implemented in userland on NetBSD. glusterfs is the only filesystem I have been seenusing it directly, but there might be others. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
Re: CVS commit: src/doc
Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > Mention mips64 support (from the first branch merge) by matt@, > > so details wont be forgotten in the release notes. > > IMO, no one will forget it because all mips ports have been broken > since the merge and we won't get the next release unless it's fixed. > > Anyway, if you would like to mention it, we should also mention > it's broken in the HEAD. Are there any specific problems or (even better) PRs for this brokenness? I've fixed all the lossage the mips64 merge has caused that I'm aware of, but admit that I haven't had time to track all the issues. Cheers, Simon.
Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libperfuse
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:39:04AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Matthias Scheler wrote: > > Can you please explain what is the difference between "libperfuse" > > and "librefuse" is? > > There is "per" instead of "re" in the name :-) Perhaps "con" would've been more appropriate, given the reactions. :) -- -- Lubomir Sedlacik--
Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libperfuse
Matthias Scheler wrote: > Can you please explain what is the difference between "libperfuse" and > "librefuse" is? There is "per" instead of "re" in the name :-) Here is the explanation: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2010/08/22/msg003843.html -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libperfuse
On 25 Aug 2010, at 8:16, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Log Message: > libperfuse(3) is a PUFFS relay to FUSE. In order to use it, > FUSE filesystem must be patched to #include in the source > files that open /dev/fuse and perform the mount(2) system call. The > FUSE filesystem must be linked with -lperfuse. Can you please explain what is the difference between "libperfuse" and "librefuse" is? Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Re: CVS commit: src/doc
> Mention mips64 support (from the first branch merge) by matt@, > so details wont be forgotten in the release notes. IMO, no one will forget it because all mips ports have been broken since the merge and we won't get the next release unless it's fixed. Anyway, if you would like to mention it, we should also mention it's broken in the HEAD. --- Izumi Tsutsui
