On Dec 14, 3:56pm, r...@netbsd.org (Jeff Rizzo) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/external/bsd/bind
| On 12/14/10 3:17 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > Module Name:src
| > Committed By: christos
| > Date: Tue Dec 14 23:17:21 UTC 2010
| >
| > Modified Files:
| >
On 12/14/10 3:17 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Tue Dec 14 23:17:21 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/external/bsd/bind: Makefile.inc
Log Message:
Handle NetBSD-5 and 4 lack of atomics by disabling threads.
To generate a diff of this
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
> for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
> me that section 7 would be the best place.
Done and done. While I am at it, even though CV
On Dec,Tuesday 14 2010, at 4:50 PM, Adam Hamsik wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: haad
> Date: Tue Dec 14 15:50:07 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/include: types.h
>
> Log Message:
> Revert change made in revision 1.66 by ad@ this is not true and 64bit
>
On Dec,Tuesday 14 2010, at 3:08 PM, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: tron
> Date: Tue Dec 14 14:08:43 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/external/cddl/osnet/dev/fbt: fbt.c
> src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/sys: debug.h note.h
>
> Log Messag
On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 01:52:50 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:22:26PM +, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: pooka
> > Date: Mon Dec 13 17:22:26 UTC 2010
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk bs
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
> for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
> me that section 7 would be the best place.
Well I guess it went to section 4 as the old lk
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> } In addition to the generic information in the old lkm(4) page [...]
>
> Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
> for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
> me that sec
On May 4, 3:25am, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
} On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:43:34PM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
} > Other than the rather generic description that existed in the older
} > lkm(4) man page, I'm not sure what we could add. I'm not even totally
} > convinced that we need to add anything...
