On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:14:05PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> Log Message:
> There is no harm to add a manual page for the GNU typeof()-construct, given
> that it has already crawled into the source tree.
A related note: should we provide typeof(3) in the restricted namespace
instead, i.e. as
On Fri Dec 17 2010 at 22:03:46 +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Fri Dec 17 2010 at 21:56:59 +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:38:07PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > Provide a re-entrant and thread-safe set of timezone API's that
> > > don't require l
On Fri Dec 17 2010 at 21:56:59 +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:38:07PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Provide a re-entrant and thread-safe set of timezone API's that
> > don't require locking and can operate on user-specified timezones
> > as opposed to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:38:07PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Log Message:
> Provide a re-entrant and thread-safe set of timezone API's that
> don't require locking and can operate on user-specified timezones
> as opposed to having to alter the environment to change a timezone.
> This work was
On May 6, 1:09pm, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
} On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:16:36AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
} > Silly question, but why would it go in section 4? Section 4 is
} > for devices. module(4) doesn't represent any kind of device. Seems to
} > me that section 7 would be the best place.
