[ moving to tech-kern ]
hi,
> y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>> >
>> > Here is the updated patch after your changes:
>> >
>> > http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/uvm_anon_freelst2.diff
>> >
>> > As you noted, uvm_anfree() can temporarily release the amap lock - that
>> > can happen
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 07:22:06AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > why is this necessary? can't we just let VOP_LOOKUP fail?
> >
> > Not to fix PR 44658.
>
> it's better to fix the vn_isunder check instead of avoiding running it.
> IMO vn_isunder should return acutal error code (eg. E
hi,
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:59:48AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> is extattr_namespace_access really necessary?
>> uid-based priviledge check in userland is often a mistake.
>
> For now it duplicates the same simple access check as in kernel:
> system attributes are restricted to root.
On 10 August 2011 13:39, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: cherry
> Date: Wed Aug 10 11:39:46 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64: fpu.c machdep.c
> src/sys/arch/i386/isa: npx.c
> src/sys/arch/x86/x86: x86_machdep.c
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:59:48AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> is extattr_namespace_access really necessary?
> uid-based priviledge check in userland is often a mistake.
For now it duplicates the same simple access check as in kernel:
system attributes are restricted to root. This is just a
hi,
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: manu
> Date: Wed Aug 3 04:11:17 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/bin/cp: cp.c utils.c
> src/bin/mv: mv.c
> src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: mi
> src/lib/libc/gen: Makefile.inc extattr.3 extattr.c
> src/lib/libc/sys: exta
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:10:13AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > Fail namei immediately if searchdir is unlinked / has been rmdir'd.
> > > Do this by checking if v_size == 0. Should fix PR 44658 (and PR 32661).
> >
> > why is this necessary? can't we just let VOP_
