> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 11:43:06PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> isn't PR/40516 a problem for this particular usage?
>
> Probably. Should we use Andrew's version for now?
matt, can you take a look?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> Dave
>
> --
> David Young OJC Technologies
Hi,
On 8 November 2011 05:50, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 06.11.2011 16:18, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By: cherry
>> Date: Sun Nov 6 15:18:19 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/arch/amd64/include: pmap.h
>> src/sys/arch/i386/include: pma
On 06.11.2011 16:18, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: cherry
> Date: Sun Nov 6 15:18:19 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
>src/sys/arch/amd64/include: pmap.h
>src/sys/arch/i386/include: pmap.h
>src/sys/arch/x86/include: cpu.h
>src/sys/a
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:36:22PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 07.11.11 21:01, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >>> The majority of interesting programs alrea
Am 07.11.11 21:01, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>> The majority of interesting programs already have USE_FORT=yes.
>>
>> But USE_FORT is not the same thing as USE
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:06:30PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Well, I tried to print the failing pattern in t_expand, and it silently
> got truncated. dprintf(3) has been part of TOG since 2006:
> (http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/dprintf.html)
> So it would be prefera
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > The majority of interesting programs already have USE_FORT=yes.
>
> But USE_FORT is not the same thing as USE_SSP.
It is stronger.
Joerg
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 11:43:06PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
>
> isn't PR/40516 a problem for this particular usage?
Probably. Should we use Andrew's version for now?
Dave
--
David Young OJC Technologies is now Pixo
dyo...@pixotech.com Urbana, IL (217) 344-0444 x2
In article <4eb7f47c.4040...@netbsd.org>,
Julio Merino wrote:
>On 11/6/11 1:18 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:christos
>> Date:Sun Nov 6 18:18:16 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/external/bsd/atf/dist/atf-c: tc.c
>>
>> Log Message
On 11/6/11 1:18 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Sun Nov 6 18:18:16 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/external/bsd/atf/dist/atf-c: tc.c
Log Message:
don't truncate error messages to 1K.
The use of dprintf cannot be merged back upstrea
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The majority of interesting programs already have USE_FORT=yes.
But USE_FORT is not the same thing as USE_SSP.
- Jukka.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:59:54AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 07.11.11 09:24, schrieb Matthias Scheler:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:51:58AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> >>> Module Name: src
> >>> Committed By:
Am 07.11.11 09:24, schrieb Matthias Scheler:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:51:58AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
>>> Module Name:src
>>> Committed By: tron
>>> Date: Sun Nov 6 22:34:48 UTC 2011
>>>
>>> M
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 06:51:58AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: tron
> > Date: Sun Nov 6 22:34:48 UTC 2011
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/share/man/man5: mk.c
14 matches
Mail list logo