On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:57:25PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:42:58PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/arch/alpha/gen: fpgetround.c fpsetround.c
Log Message:
Add some casts to get rid of
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Modified Files:
src/lib/libarch/alpha: alpha_pci_io.c
Log Message:
Add a cast of the shift count to int32_t, so that we don't try
to do int32_t long, since ANSI C doesn't perform balancing
before the shift operation according to lint. Should
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 07:27:18 +, David Laight wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:57:25PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:42:58PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/arch/alpha/gen: fpgetround.c
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/gen: modf_ieee754.c
Log Message:
Add a pair of casts to silence lint about conversion possibly losing bits.
- v.dblu_dbl.dbl_fracl = frac 0x;
- v.dblu_dbl.dbl_frach = frac 32;
+
In article 20120322100642.ga1...@apb-laptoy.apb.alt.za,
Alan Barrett a...@cequrux.com wrote:
I don't know what balancing means, but this seems bogus to
me. The type of the right hand operand of the operator is
irrelevant; only its value is important. (See sectiopn 6.5.7 of
the C99
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
IMHO, as long as lint is capable of helping us spot actual
problems, adding a few of these sorts of constrcucts seems like a
small price to pay.
It doesn't. From what I see, the signal to noise ratio of lint is
completely
On Mar 22, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
IMHO, as long as lint is capable of helping us spot actual
problems, adding a few of these sorts of constrcucts seems like a
small price to pay.
It doesn't. From what I