On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 07:13:34AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > OTOH for netbsd-6 maybe a better patch would be to change cache_enter
> > to return instead of asserting for long filenames.
>
> If nobody opposes, I can do that.
Best to ask on tech-kern, but it seems unlikely to be contro
David Holland wrote:
> OTOH for netbsd-6 maybe a better patch would be to change cache_enter
> to return instead of asserting for long filenames.
If nobody opposes, I can do that.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:07:06PM +, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > > This is wrong; you're reverting rmind's cleanup.
> >
> > I backed out the change. Will someone pullup the change to netbsd-6?
Can you prepare a patch that applies before rmind's cleanup? (Or just
one that applies on netbsd-
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:34:38PM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
>
> > > Di not call cache_enter with path components bigger than NCHNAMLEN, as it
> > > panics the kernel.
> >
> > This is wrong; you're reverting rmind's cleanup.
>
> I backed out the change. Will someon
David Holland wrote:
> > Di not call cache_enter with path components bigger than NCHNAMLEN, as it
> > panics the kernel.
>
> This is wrong; you're reverting rmind's cleanup.
I backed out the change. Will someone pullup the change to netbsd-6?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:15:31PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By:manu
> Date:Mon Jul 23 12:15:31 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/fs/puffs: puffs_node.c puffs_vnops.c
>
> Log Message:
> Di not call cache_enter with pat
I think fec(4) is too common. I'd give SoC periph devs more
descriptive names, like mpc8xxxfec(4).
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: matt
> Date: Mon Jul 23 13:05:48 UTC 2012
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev: DEVNAMES
