> Not much point writing an error is you'vejust failed to write to stderr!
i disagree -- ktrace sees it and thus it is not entirely lost :)
"Matt Thomas" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: matt
> Date: Sat Jan 26 07:08:14 UTC 2013
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/arch/arm/softfloat: arm-gcc.h
>
> Log Message:
> Appease clang by making 64-bit literals use ULL
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdif
In article <20130126205325.gd28...@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk>,
David Laight wrote:
>I'd have been tempted to do:
>
>int stupid_glibc_wont_let_us_ignore_the_result_of_write(int fd, const
>void *buf, size_t len)
>{
> return write(fd, buf, len);
>}
It is the linux headers :-)
>I'm not sure, but I
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Sat Jan 26 15:53:00 UTC 2013
>
> Modified Files:
> src/usr.bin/make: job.c main.c
>
> Log Message:
> Check read and write errors to avoid warnings from linux.
> XXX:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:06:09PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:05 PM, David Laight wrote:
>
> >> Log Message:
> >> For platforms where we cannot fit a char * into a long, return NULL
> >> and set errno to ENOTSUPP.
> >
> > Could the 'char *' pointers be replaced with inde
