Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Alexander Nasonov
Marc Balmer wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: mbalmer Date: Wed Oct 16 19:44:58 UTC 2013 Added Files: src/sys/modules/lua: Makefile assert.h ctype.h errno.h infinite.lua inttypes.h limits.h locale.h lua.c luaconf.h luavar.h math.h setjmp.h signal.h

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 18.10.13 09:16, schrieb Alexander Nasonov: Marc Balmer wrote: Module Name: src Committed By:mbalmer Date:Wed Oct 16 19:44:58 UTC 2013 Added Files: src/sys/modules/lua: Makefile assert.h ctype.h errno.h infinite.lua inttypes.h limits.h locale.h lua.c

re: CVS commit: src/external/mit/xorg/lib

2013-10-18 Thread matthew green
Module Name: src Committed By: riz Date: Fri Oct 18 01:12:00 UTC 2013 Modified Files: src/external/mit/xorg/lib/libX11: Makefile.libx11 src/external/mit/xorg/lib/libXi: Makefile Log Message: Before testing the value of HAVE_GCC, test if it's defined. this

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 08:16:32AM +0100, Alexander Nasonov wrote: First of all, the code has been imported the wrong way as I stated in the previous email. You should properly import Lua 5.2 to sys/external/ and then apply local changes required to run it in kernel space. I agree. Already for

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Taylor R Campbell
From: Marc Balmer mbal...@netbsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:44:58 + welcome lua(4), a devide driver that can create and control Lua states inside the kernel Did you get core approval for this? The public discussion is still ongoing, and still lacking in evidence, and there

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 18.10.13 14:24, schrieb Taylor R Campbell: From: Marc Balmer mbal...@netbsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:44:58 + welcome lua(4), a devide driver that can create and control Lua states inside the kernel Did you get core approval for this? The public discussion is

Re: CVS commit: xsrc/external/mit/xdm/dist/xdm

2013-10-18 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article 20131018163140.a391...@cvs.netbsd.org, Alan Barrett source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote: -=-=-=-=-=- Module Name: xsrc Committed By: apb Date: Fri Oct 18 16:31:40 UTC 2013 Modified Files: xsrc/external/mit/xdm/dist/xdm: xdmauth.c Log Message: The result from strlen()

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Alexander Nasonov
Marc Balmer wrote: This was not an import of Lua. The Lua sources already are in the tree. When we are ready to move from Lua 5.1 to Lua 5.2, Lua 5.2 will be imported to sys/external, as I already mentioned. In this case, kernel changes should have been added to 5.1 source and later ported

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 18.10.13 19:13, schrieb Alexander Nasonov: Marc Balmer wrote: This was not an import of Lua. The Lua sources already are in the tree. When we are ready to move from Lua 5.1 to Lua 5.2, Lua 5.2 will be imported to sys/external, as I already mentioned. In this case, kernel changes should

Re: CVS commit: xsrc/external/mit/xdm/dist/xdm

2013-10-18 Thread Alan Barrett
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Christos Zoulas wrote: The result from strlen() has type size_t, so print it with %zd format. %zu is correct. Fixed, thanks.

Re: CVS commit: xsrc/external/mit/xdm/dist/xdm

2013-10-18 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:59:38PM +, Alan Barrett wrote: Module Name: xsrc Committed By: apb Date: Fri Oct 18 15:59:38 UTC 2013 Modified Files: xsrc/external/mit/xdm/dist/xdm: dm.c Log Message: Print time_t values by casting to intmax_t and using %ji format.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Alan Barrett
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Marc Balmer wrote: Did you get core approval for this? The public discussion is still ongoing, and still lacking in evidence, and there has been no public statement by core as far as I am aware, nor did any members of core I asked have any recollection of approving this.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/modules/lua

2013-10-18 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
apb@ wrote: On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Marc Balmer wrote: Did you get core approval for this? The public discussion is still ongoing, and still lacking in evidence, and there has been no public statement by core as far as I am aware, nor did any members of core I asked have any