You need sizeof(ptr) alignment, not 4.
On Wednesday, November 12, 2014, Christos Zoulas
wrote:
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Wed Nov 12 02:15:58 UTC 2014
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/conf: mkldscript.sh
>
> Log Message:
> I don't know what was using
Now .kmod has
.text
.data
link_set_*
.rodata
:
instead of
.text
.rodata
link_set_*
.data
:
This may work, because modular(9) maps everything as RWX
(uvm_km_alloc(UVM_KMF_WIRED | UVM_KMF_EXEC)). But still...
> On Nov 11, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Michael wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:14:18 +0100
> Martin Husemann wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:10:08PM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
>>> } >The latest import fixed m68k (but tsutsui-san asked for a bit more
>>> testing,
>>> } >which I did
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:14:18 +0100
Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:10:08PM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> > } >The latest import fixed m68k (but tsutsui-san asked for a bit more
> > testing,
> > } >which I didn't manage to get around too yet).
> > }
> > } If you switch,
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:37 -0500
chris...@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
> On Nov 11, 11:14pm, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch
>
> | The request for more testing before switching was not unreasonable, and
> | I bet the amount o
On Nov 11, 11:14pm, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch
| The request for more testing before switching was not unreasonable, and
| I bet the amount of people testing -current on m68k is pretty limited anyway.
|
| However, I'm updating my mac68k ri
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:10:08PM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> } >The latest import fixed m68k (but tsutsui-san asked for a bit more testing,
> } >which I didn't manage to get around too yet).
> }
> } If you switch, more people will test :-)
>
> Or, tsutsui-san will back it out. :->
The re
On Nov 11, 6:59pm, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} In article <2014163355.gk8...@mail.duskware.de>,
} Martin Husemann wrote:
} >On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:29:44PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} >> Can we move powerpc to gcc-4.8 then? What about m68k? It would be great
} >> if those could be done f
In article <2014163355.gk8...@mail.duskware.de>,
Martin Husemann wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:29:44PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Can we move powerpc to gcc-4.8 then? What about m68k? It would be great
>> if those could be done for -7!
>
>The latest import fixed m68k (but tsutsui-s
Antti Kantee wrote:
>Module Name:src
>Committed By: pooka
>Date: Sun Nov 9 17:39:38 UTC 2014
>
>Modified Files:
>src/lib/librump: Makefile
>src/lib/librumpuser: Makefile
>src/lib/librumpvfs: Makefile
>src/share/man: Makefile
>src/sys/rump: Ma
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:29:44PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Can we move powerpc to gcc-4.8 then? What about m68k? It would be great
> if those could be done for -7!
The latest import fixed m68k (but tsutsui-san asked for a bit more testing,
which I didn't manage to get around too yet).
Mar
In article <20141110234332.5411cead@blackbush>,
Michael wrote:
>
>And a clang-built kernel boots just fine now, at least on my beige G3.
>Going to torture it for a bit now.
Can we move powerpc to gcc-4.8 then? What about m68k? It would be great
if those could be done for -7!
christos
12 matches
Mail list logo
