In article 20141126164843.5cdd...@cvs.netbsd.org,
Christos Zoulas source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
-=-=-=-=-=-
Module Name: src
Committed By: christos
Date: Wed Nov 26 16:48:43 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/lib/libc/gen: opendir.c
Log Message:
- Use O_DIRECTORY to open the
On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:38 AM, Ryota Ozaki ozak...@netbsd.org wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: ozaki-r
Date: Wed Nov 26 09:38:42 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/sys/net: if.c if.h
Log Message:
Change if_slowtimo_ch to a pointer
One benefit to do so is to reduce
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Matt Thomas m...@3am-software.com wrote:
On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:38 AM, Ryota Ozaki ozak...@netbsd.org wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: ozaki-r
Date: Wed Nov 26 09:38:42 UTC 2014
Modified Files:
src/sys/net: if.c if.h
Log Message:
Maybe adding a few spare members, like 5 pointers, to reduce # of bumps ... ?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe adding a few spare members, like 5 pointers, to reduce # of bumps ... ?
Or completely hide sizeof(struct ifnet) by forcing use of if_alloc(),
as struct device did.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe adding a few spare members, like 5 pointers, to reduce # of bumps ... ?
I thought the version bump is required because a member has been changed
(a struct to a pointer). So IIUC the spare members don't help for
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe adding a few spare members, like 5 pointers, to reduce # of bumps ... ?
Or completely hide sizeof(struct ifnet) by forcing use of
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
Ryota Ozaki writes:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe adding a few spare members, like 5 pointers, to reduce # of bumps
... ?
I thought the version bump is required
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
hiding stuff inside an alloc doesn't really help much when the
kernel code needs to access the structure anyway, unless you
also hide all accesses to the structure inside functions.
Right. And some members, including
On Nov 26, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Masao Uebayashi uebay...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe adding a few spare members, like 5 pointers, to reduce # of bumps ... ?
Or completely hide sizeof(struct ifnet) by forcing use of
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Matt Thomas m...@3am-software.com wrote:
Or completely hide sizeof(struct ifnet) by forcing use of if_alloc(),
as struct device did.
Doesn't work since struct ifnet is embedded in ethercom/fddicom
Right. I mean, I want to make them alloc'ed to improve
11 matches
Mail list logo
