On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Christoph Badura <b...@bsd.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:09:02AM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Matt Thomas <m...@3am-software.com> wrote:
>> > It lacks compensating for the fact the CRC has been stripped by the
>> > time vlan gets the packet.
>>
>> # matt@ explained well than me...
>>
>> Note that the issue was found by some strict packet capture software
>> (not by me, so I don't know what it is); typical OSes don't complain
>> the extra padding, so we didn't notice the issue until recently.
>
> Yeah.  I misunderstood your message in the PR.  I read it as if
> if_vlan.c should be sending 72 byte minimum size packets and the code
> was doing something different.  That's why I asked.
>
> Maybe we should update the PR.

Updated!
  ozaki-r

Reply via email to