On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:33:19PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> So we agree? Each compat should be independent.
Yes.
> It seems to me that
> re-implementing (copy-paste) a few functions for linux is a step towards
> direction, isn't it?
No, it isn't (but it MAY be ok for real trivial ones).
Le 15/08/2017 à 14:50, Martin Husemann a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 02:48:39PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
Why is it a bad idea re-implement the few compat_xx functions used in
compat_linux? This would eliminate the dependency, and a single modload
would suffice.
Move them into a common
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 02:48:39PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Why is it a bad idea re-implement the few compat_xx functions used in
> compat_linux? This would eliminate the dependency, and a single modload
> would suffice.
Move them into a common module required by all current consumers.
Le 04/08/2017 à 10:00, matthew green a écrit :
the setup comes from before modules and it allows code sharing
because the old 43 version matches other systems. so there's
a single implementation of this code for a large number of
consumers, and the name of it describes where it comes from.
this
