On 19/08/2018 01:02, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Oops, I forgot to CC to source-changes-d@.
[snip]
On 2018/08/19 3:48, matthew green wrote:
can't we make arm and arm64 use the identical majors file?
please!
Diff between majors.arm32 and aarch64 reads
[snip]
- ctcom was added by matt@ back in
Oops, I forgot to CC to source-changes-d@.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Merge majors.{arm32,aarch64} into single file (Re: CVS commit:
src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf)
To: matthew green
Cc: Jared McNeill , Nick Hudson , Ryo
Shimizu
From: Rin Okuyama
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 08:57:53
On 2018/08/19 1:11, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Aug 18, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Rin Okuyama wrote:
...
"ifdef" statements refer "attrtab", whose entries are not normalized to
lower-case. Therefore, "ifdef arm32" becomes false even if we have
"options ARM32", as I wrote in the previous message:
can't we make arm and arm64 use the identical majors file?
please!
.mrg.
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Rin Okuyama wrote:
>
> On 2018/08/19 0:06, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>>> On 2018/08/18 20:08, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Ah, then it should be "if ARM32". It was "if arm32" in rev. 1.31.
>>>
>>> Sorry, not 1.31 but 1.30.
>> That's because all options are normalized to
>On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:06:41AM +, Ryo Shimizu wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:ryo
>> Date:Sat Aug 11 10:06:41 UTC 2018
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/lib/libc/arch/aarch64/softfloat: qp.c
>>
>> Log Message:
>> fix multiple definition of
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018, Rin Okuyama wrote:
On 2018/08/18 22:41, Jared McNeill wrote:
Not sure I understand this change. arm32 should be defined on 32-bit evbarm
platforms via std.evbarm.
If arm32 is not defined, I wouldn't expect a kernel to link as there are
dependencies on it in
On 2018/08/19 0:06, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On 2018/08/18 20:08, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Ah, then it should be "if ARM32". It was "if arm32" in rev. 1.31.
Sorry, not 1.31 but 1.30.
That's because all options are normalized to lower-case.
Oops, not "if" but "ifdef".
"ifdef" statements refer
On 2018/08/18 22:41, Jared McNeill wrote:
Not sure I understand this change. arm32 should be defined on 32-bit evbarm
platforms via std.evbarm.
If arm32 is not defined, I wouldn't expect a kernel to link as there are
dependencies on it in arch/arm/conf/files.arm as well.
No "arm32" is not
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 7:59 AM, Rin Okuyama wrote:
>
> On 2018/08/18 20:08, Rin Okuyama wrote:
>> Ah, then it should be "if ARM32". It was "if arm32" in rev. 1.31.
>
> Sorry, not 1.31 but 1.30.
That's because all options are normalized to lower-case.
-- thorpej
On 2018/08/18 20:08, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Ah, then it should be "if ARM32". It was "if arm32" in rev. 1.31.
Sorry, not 1.31 but 1.30.
On 2018/08/18 18:51, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 18/08/2018 10:29, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: rin
Date: Sat Aug 18 09:29:45 UTC
Not sure I understand this change. arm32 should be defined on 32-bit
evbarm platforms via std.evbarm.
If arm32 is not defined, I wouldn't expect a kernel to link as there are
dependencies on it in arch/arm/conf/files.arm as well.
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name:
Ah, then it should be "if ARM32". It was "if arm32" in rev. 1.31.
On 2018/08/18 18:51, Nick Hudson wrote:
On 18/08/2018 10:29, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: rin
Date: Sat Aug 18 09:29:45 UTC 2018
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf: files.evbarm
Log
On 18/08/2018 10:29, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: rin
Date: Sat Aug 18 09:29:45 UTC 2018
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/evbarm/conf: files.evbarm
Log Message:
Fix a bug introduced in the previous revision;
We don't define arm32 anywhere, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
