> > > Log Message:
> > > Expunge the panicstr checks, we don't need them.
> >
> > can you explain why?
>
> Sure, [ .. ]
ah, wow. i didn't realise it had such a bad effect on cpus before
they actually go properly down.
we should probably work hard to make them go down faster if possible,
though
Paul Goyette wrote:
> This commit seems to have broken amd64 booting! When booting into
> a qemu environment (as set up by misc/py-anita), it just hangs while
> printing the "progress numbers with the spinny cursor". Others on
> irc/icb have indicated an immediate crash.
I rolled back the chan
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:06:33AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> "Andrew Doran" writes:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: ad
> > Date: Mon Dec 9 21:02:10 UTC 2019
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/kern: kern_rwlock.c
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Expunge the pan
Paul Goyette wrote:
> This commit seems to have broken amd64 booting! When booting into
> a qemu environment (as set up by misc/py-anita), it just hangs while
> printing the "progress numbers with the spinny cursor". Others on
> irc/icb have indicated an immediate crash.
>
> Seems like non-efi
"Andrew Doran" writes:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: ad
> Date: Mon Dec 9 21:02:10 UTC 2019
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: kern_rwlock.c
>
> Log Message:
> Expunge the panicstr checks, we don't need them.
can you explain why? what sort of crash-time testing did
you per
This commit seems to have broken amd64 booting! When booting into
a qemu environment (as set up by misc/py-anita), it just hangs while
printing the "progress numbers with the spinny cursor". Others on
irc/icb have indicated an immediate crash.
Seems like non-efi booting is borked.
Module Nam
