On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Now that I'm looking at i386 I see you've indeed made the same nonsensical
> changes there, with all the unnecessary garbage in the code.
Here I assume you refer to the starting at efi_multiboot2_loader, since
most of the other sign
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> .text : AT (ADDR(.text) & 0x0fff)
> {
> + *(.multiboot)
> +
> . = ALIGN(__PAGE_SIZE);
> __text_user_start = . ;
> ...
>
> This guarantees that the structure is at
Hi tkusumi,
Thanks for the work you are doing.
On 27/12/2019 11:06, Tomohiro Kusumi wrote:
taken-from: FreeBSD (freebsd/freebsd@b4d7ad9f787e74e712423def67de8bd76f71943a)
One minor nit, could you please cite the revision in the svn repo which
is the source of truth and not the readonly git mir
Le 27/12/2019 à 17:45, Emmanuel Dreyfus a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:02:17AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
>> Please stop with the nonsense... In this patch you are making the multiboot
>> header executable, and putting it in a section shared with userland under
>> SVS. Neither should be r
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:02:17AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Please stop with the nonsense... In this patch you are making the multiboot
> header executable, and putting it in a section shared with userland under
> SVS. Neither should be required; more than that, both are absolutely _not_
> wa
Hi,
Your patch works fine for my laptop too.
Thank you.
Masanobu SAITOH writes:
> On 2019/12/27 1:55, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 05:05:11PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
> After this change, amd64 kernel does not boot on my HP Spectre x360
> 13-inch ae019TU lapt
Le 26/12/2019 à 17:55, Emmanuel Dreyfus a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 05:05:11PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
After this change, amd64 kernel does not boot on my HP Spectre x360
13-inch ae019TU laptop with pure UEFI boot mode.
>> I have a UEFI boot machine and it also doesn't boot
