On 05/01/2020 13:47, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
[snip]
My patch allows COPTS to be overridden as
http://src.illumos.org/source/xref/netbsd-src/sys/conf/Makefile.kern.inc#69
has
69 DEFCOPTS?= -O2
70 COPTS?= ${DEFCOPTS}
which I believe allows COPTS to be overridden by
makeoptions
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 02:43:43PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> I have now requested to core@ that multiboot in amd64 be reverted entirely.
So far I privilegied working on a fix to the boot problem that was
reported, rather than spending time on a revert. This was not a futile
effort, since at
> >> I don't see how as sys/arch/zaurus/conf/INSTALL doesn't define DDB.
> >
> > On zaurus GENERIC also has a size restriction (due to bootloader).
>
> Yes, I understand that. What I don't understand is how my
> sys/arch/arm/conf/Makefile.arm change affects the zaurus INSTALL kernel
> size
Le 05/01/2020 à 13:56, Maxime Villard a écrit :
> Le 05/01/2020 à 02:03, Emmanuel Dreyfus a écrit :
>> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 08:43:16AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
>>> +.section multiboot,"",@note
>>> Why @note? It will be in the .text anyway. Also why no dot in the section
>>> name? That's
On 05/01/2020 13:31, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:21:46PM +, Nick Hudson wrote:
Yes, I understand that. What I don't understand is how my
sys/arch/arm/conf/Makefile.arm change affects the zaurus INSTALL kernel
size because INSTALL specifically disables DDB and my patch
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 01:21:46PM +, Nick Hudson wrote:
> Yes, I understand that. What I don't understand is how my
> sys/arch/arm/conf/Makefile.arm change affects the zaurus INSTALL kernel
> size because INSTALL specifically disables DDB and my patch is
> conditional on DDB
It did only
On 04/01/2020 16:32, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
The problem is caused by sys/arch/arm/conf/Makefile.arm.
It defines "COPTS+= -mapcs-frame" in recent rev 1.52
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/arm/conf/Makefile.arm#rev1.52
but MI sys/conf/Makefile.kern.inc defines COPTS+=-O2
only
Le 05/01/2020 à 02:03, Emmanuel Dreyfus a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 08:43:16AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
>> +.section multiboot,"",@note
>> Why @note? It will be in the .text anyway. Also why no dot in the section
>> name? That's supposed to be the naming convention.
>
> The idea is
