Re: CVS commit: src/include

2020-04-17 Thread Paul Goyette
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: On 17.04.2020 22:22, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 03:22:35PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: kamil Date: Fri Apr 17 15:22:35 UTC 2020 Modified Files: src/include: assert.h

Re: CVS commit: src/include

2020-04-17 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
On 17.04.2020 22:22, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 03:22:35PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By:kamil >> Date:Fri Apr 17 15:22:35 UTC 2020 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/include: assert.h >> >> Log Message: >> Remove

Re: CVS commit: src/include

2020-04-17 Thread Paul Goyette
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 03:22:35PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: kamil Date: Fri Apr 17 15:22:35 UTC 2020 Modified Files: src/include: assert.h Log Message: Remove the static_assert()

Re: CVS commit: src/include

2020-04-17 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 03:22:35PM +, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: kamil > Date: Fri Apr 17 15:22:35 UTC 2020 > > Modified Files: > src/include: assert.h > > Log Message: > Remove the static_assert() fallback for pre-C11 and pre-C++11 > > C++

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:52:53 -0700 From:Jason Thorpe Message-ID: <7e54033f-9f14-4db3-a11a-01d63cd92...@me.com> | The New Hotness (which isn't particularly new, at this point) | is to create branches and merge what you want into that branch. What I don't

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread maya
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 05:01:15PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:52:53AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > > > > On Apr 17, 2020, at 7:46 AM, Robert Elz wrote: > > > > > >Date:Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:37:33 +0200 > > >From:Manuel Bouyer > > >

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/libhack

2020-04-17 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
jdolecek@ wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: jdolecek > Date: Fri Apr 17 14:55:24 UTC 2020 > > Modified Files: > src/distrib/utils/libhack: Makefile.inc > > Log Message: > include aligned_alloc(3), now needed for newfs and fsck_ffs Could you consider to disable such extra

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Manuel Bouyer
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:52:53AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > > On Apr 17, 2020, at 7:46 AM, Robert Elz wrote: > > > >Date:Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:37:33 +0200 > >From:Manuel Bouyer > >Message-ID: <20200417133733.ga5...@antioche.eu.org> > > > > | And that would be

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 7:46 AM, Robert Elz wrote: > >Date:Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:37:33 +0200 >From:Manuel Bouyer >Message-ID: <20200417133733.ga5...@antioche.eu.org> > > | And that would be a problem for me. I regulary update a single file to a > | specific

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:37:33 +0200 From:Manuel Bouyer Message-ID: <20200417133733.ga5...@antioche.eu.org> | And that would be a problem for me. I regulary update a single file to a | specific revision in a source tree. Me too - I pull the current sh into

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 6:28 AM, Rin Okuyama wrote: > > On 2020/04/17 22:14, Jason Thorpe wrote: >>> On Apr 17, 2020, at 12:24 AM, Robert Elz wrote: >>> >>> For this, RCS and RCS semantics are irrelevant aren't they? >> No, not really. With the modern systems, the "commit ID" identifies the

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Manuel Bouyer
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 06:14:26AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > > On Apr 17, 2020, at 12:24 AM, Robert Elz wrote: > > > > For this, RCS and RCS semantics are irrelevant aren't they? > > No, not really. With the modern systems, the "commit ID" identifies the > state of the entire collection

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Rin Okuyama
On 2020/04/17 22:14, Jason Thorpe wrote: On Apr 17, 2020, at 12:24 AM, Robert Elz wrote: For this, RCS and RCS semantics are irrelevant aren't they? No, not really. With the modern systems, the "commit ID" identifies the state of the entire collection of files, not individual ones.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 12:24 AM, Robert Elz wrote: > > For this, RCS and RCS semantics are irrelevant aren't they? No, not really. With the modern systems, the "commit ID" identifies the state of the entire collection of files, not individual ones. Thus, you only need exactly one instance

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2020-04-17 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:04:04 -0700 From:Jason Thorpe Message-ID: <432f538a-b863-441b-b4d0-0cd2e9d38...@me.com> | The sooner we get off of "things that use RCS semantics" the better. For this, RCS and RCS semantics are irrelevant aren't they? The only relevance